Oh, I saw the issue. Was just adding that is the ideal set-up and the MSG situation is a mess. I'm sure it will be figured out because it would be stupid to lose a roughly 20k arena in the middle of Manhattan and I would think it'd be almost impossible to find land on Manhattan island to build elsewhere.I don't think anyone disagrees with the concept of robust rail access to arenas. Heck, with the opening of UBS, all the major league sports indoor arenas in the Boston–Washington corridor are either proximate to a major rail hub, or a short connecting train ride away.
TD: atop North Station
UBS: Belmont Park station for trains to points west, and Elmont station along the LIRR main line.
MSG: atop Penn Station
Prudential: A two-block walk to Newark Penn Station (which can be traversed by enclosed pedestrian bridges).
Wells Fargo: End of the Broad Street subway running to Center City (and if the 76ers arena plan does go through, it would be adjacent to Jefferson Station at Market East)
Capital One: Atop the Gallery Place/Chinatown station (a major transfer station) two stops from Union Station.
The issue here is that MSG is actively impeding the functioning of the rail station, unlike all the others.
(Also, am I the only one that finds it funny that all of the aforementioned arenas are name sponsored by banks. Even MSG is "Madison Square Garden presented by Chase" these days.)
Among those stadiums are only TD and MSG like Toronto in the sense that not only are they at a major point for the local subway system, but also the major connecting hub for the suburban train system. I know Penn and North stations are the major train stations in their city not only for subway, but inter-city rail. Interestingly, Toronto is also sponsored by a bank (Bank of Nova Scotia)