groovejuice
Without deviation progress is not possible
Hoping for a better game tonight. It's a good rivalry and thinking the team will have to get off to a great start. GHG!
He has been a play off disappointment. Every year.Haven't you been reading these boards during any of the past few playoffs ? He was getting heavily bashed (deservedly so).
Why would he stop? You are not thinking reasonably.He does it every year with the same results. Might as well continue right?
I never wrote that I thought that Pacioretty was lazy or a bum or that I hated him, where did you get that?
play of LOSSESTime to avenge our playoff loss. Hope the boys are ready when the puck drops cause if the Rangers score first, it might turn ugly again.
GO GO
I have a good feeling about tonight....
That's silly. But Hemsky is going to do absolutely nothing playing with grinders.Exactly what I was suggesting yesterday night after te Wash. game.
They cannot be worse than these two over-the-hill players.
What are his weaknesses or shortcomings?
Signing players that are clearly past their prime does not work.Why would he stop? You are not thinking reasonably.
It does not work most of the time. That is no reason to stop taking that literally inexistent risk if there is a potential reward out of it. The signing doesn't work out? That 1M, halfway through the season, literally won't hurt you if you send the player down.Signing players that are clearly past their prime does not work.
It does not work most of the time. That is no reason to stop taking that literally inexistent risk. The signing doesn't work out? That 1M, halfway through the season, literally won't hurt you if you send the player down.
And FYI, Hemsky was injured most of the year last season, and he scored like 35 ES points the season before. That is absurdly high. Nobody was whining at the signing due to the low risk involved, until he has had 2 bad games (a very meaningful amount of games)