Not really. Additions to coaching alone should help our scoring. Early yet but at practice and exhibition games this team looks significantly better than last.
Richardson big upgrade on JJ, so far anyway. Like how he is handling Juulsen. Having Bouchard in Laval should be big improvement in our depth. Where Syl couldn't.
If we have Weber healthy for 50 games, and Price we can play meaningful hockey down the stretch.
K is making us look better than we are, but I think we can play .500 hockey
Sigh. It's pre-season making us look better, not Kotkaniemi.
And forget Weber for 50 games. 2 weeks ago (sept 11th) he said he wants to return as soon as possible, but if it's still 4 months, he'll do 4 months.
He'd need to return a full month earlier than expected to be here 50 games as 4 months would put his return close to January 11th which is around the 45th game mark with only 37 remaining and even then, he won't be effective from the getgo, so that gives us a max of around 40 games of 100% Weber if he comes back a full month earlier. More realistically, around 25-30 games at 100% if he sticks to his prescribed date.
I do agree that the coaching will be a variable that could go for the better, but I wouldn't expect miracles considering there are gaping holes everywhere in the linepup and our division has become much tougher. I won't sell them short (coaching), but you shouldn't praise them up so quickly.
,500 hockey is, imo, a scenario where we overachieve, so I'm not expecting that.
Recent news on Shea Weber - Montreal Canadiens - Rotoworld.com