GDT: Montréal Canadiens vs. St-Louis Blues (Oct. 26 - 7:00 PM, TVAS/City)

Status
Not open for further replies.

austin316

Registered User
Oct 4, 2016
1,414
1,675
How many odd man rushes has St Louis had tonight? This is getting comical it’s so pathetic how bad we are in our own zone
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
32,706
35,920
At least they back checked otherwise Hutson would have looked really stupid there. Still did a little, but that's expected given his like 10 games
 

Apoplectic Habs Fan

Registered User
Aug 17, 2002
30,046
18,884
You seriously going to repramand someone for falling? Shit happens, What's Marty gonna say, stay on your feet Mike!!

Mailloux is in over his head, noy his fault we got noone else right now to play in his stead. Barron > Mailloux

Cover someone after you fall?

And lets not act like its a one off
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
84,935
154,888
1st and 2nd for Newhook. 1st and 2nd for Dvorak. High 1st a 3rd for Dach. My hopes are still there for Dach....but for a team rebuilding...those returns HAVE to pay off!
If need be, Newhook can be flipped in the summer. I hope he shows something before that even becomes a conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldCraig71

Habit11

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
3,752
1,120
The defence is too aggressive in the offensive zone. Savard should never ever think about offence, but he just did and like the 12th odd man rush against.
 

McGees

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
13,657
27,089
We are picking a RD in the 1st round.....
IMG_0888.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Whitesnake

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
8,626
11,190
Would Romanov be our best defenseman right now?
Defensively, yes, but Habs defensive issues are decision making from more than one player.

The 2/3 v 1 are the result of the Ds activating and none of the forwards going to take their spot. They are playing 2-1-2, but too many players don't give a shit about filling in for certain of the spots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad