Management Montgomery fired - Sacco named interim coach Sacco - Blues hire Monty

Gee Wally

Old, Grumpy Moderator
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
76,579
98,723
HF retirement home
Good read:



For all our disagreements and contentious back-and-forths at press conferences over the years, I actually do think Don Sweeney is a pretty solid general manager and have thought that for a while now. We’re all entirely too dug in on our opinions to truly sway one another so I won’t bother trying here, but he’s simply not as good nor as bad as his supporters and critics scream on the internet and on the airwaves. He’s truly somewhere in the middle, with, again, ‘pretty solid’ being the best way to describe his body of work throughout his tenure.

But barring something downright catastrophic or unpredictable from a conduct standpoint involving the next permanent head coach, Montgomery has to be the last coach that Sweeney (and Neely) are allowed to fire.

It’s now been 13 years and counting since the Bruins last won a Cup. It’s now been over five years since they made it to the fourth round, and in Sweeney’s nine seasons on the job to date they’ve won multiple playoff rounds just once (2019). And at a certain point, as coaches continue to be dismissed for not meeting the front office’s bar for one reason or another, the bar for the GM to keep his job has to be set higher than “just make the playoffs.”

As an organization (and when I say that I mean at the top), the Bruins have essentially scoffed at the idea of ever committing themselves to a Chicago-style — tomato slices and gigantic pickle slices at LW1 and RD1 — rebuild. Their thinking behind that is that their fans would not accept that kind of arduous process that’s defined by overwhelming stretches of team-engineered futility for the hopes of dynasty potential five years down the road. Their last experience with that came all the way back in 2005, and by spring 2007 they were officially done with it.

So, when you factor that philosophy into the equation, Sweeney is their perfect general manager. He’s never once operated from a rebuilding mindset, and he’s build a playoff club in every year but his first, and even that year they were a Tuukka Rask sickness in Game 82 away from sneaking into the postseason.

But there’s not another GM in hockey who’s been allowed to fire three coaches before meeting the executioner’s blade himself. And there’s no denying that Sweeney’s moves are a significant reason why Montgomery is beginning his Wednesday morning with emails from Indeed, Zillow, and an ‘Open to Work’ banner on his LinkedIn.


It was Sweeney, not Montgomery, who made Elias Lindholm and Nikita Zadorov his July 1 priorities less than two months after saying that the Bruins needed to get faster and add secondary scoring. And it was Sweeney, not Montgomery, who decided to commit $11.25 million in goal after by all means acknowledging that it wasn’t feasible to pay Swayman his money and keep Linus Ullmark around at $5 million per season for another year.

And it was Sweeney and Neely, not Montgomery, who’ve apparently had their brains broken so badly by what the Panthers have done to them in back-to-back postseasons that they’ve decided to send the Bruins back in time with size and grit in a game that’s only getting more skilled and faster every single season.

It’s on the Black and Gold’s next coach to maximize what they do have courtesy of Sweeney, of course, but if they can’t, there’s truly nobody to blame but the guys who built the roster in the first place. Especially as the current banners in the TD Garden rafters only get older and become more and more of a distant memory.
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,426
41,790
Yeah, Kasper was an idiot. Putting one of the greatest PP quarterbacks in history on the wing was just one of his many inept moves. But to be fair, Kasper was Sinden's inevitable bargain basement response to his "See I sometimes spend the money" hiring of Sutter, and never should have been in the position to begin with.

Just another case of Harry using his failed free agent and/or coach signings to justify his miserly ways.
It was slightly before my time so I might be wrong and an open to correction by those who were watching regularly from 91-94, but a few months back I watched some of the 1992 playoffs on YouTube and what was clear in the interviews and such was that that team LOVED Rick Bowness and would skate through a wall for him. He did nothing to deserve losing his job other than the fact that a big shot name in Sutter hit the market and Harry wanted to lock him in. Makes me wonder if they have different results if they didn't pursue Sutter and kept Rick Bowness for the mid-90s.
 

smithformeragent

Moderator
Sep 22, 2005
34,200
27,930
Milford, NH
Sweeney making it clear that the players showed up to camp unprepared "Did they think it was going to be easy?"

Speaks specifically about the Lindholm and Zadorov signings. Pretty frank assessment.

Asked about Montgomery's lame duck status entering the season. Says they were in negotiations on an extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
9,249
10,872
There's been some questions regarding Sway and "drama" that have been completely dodged. I couldnt fully hear them.

I do respect those who have flat out asked about it. That's their job and there really shouldnt be any punches pulled especially with this particular presser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and BMC

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,426
41,790
The Livestream zoomed out after Sweeney left. I always thought there was just a big black backdrop of a wall behind them, but it's actually just that image on a tiny flat screen TV behind the podium in a boring office room.

So he didn't lose the room but you fired him anyways. Cool cool!
It's certainly possible to be personable and well-liked and yet produce poor results, no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BB79

Blitzkrug

Registered User
Sep 17, 2013
27,462
9,323
Winnipeg
This presser is so bad lmao
Interesting that they entered into extension talks and couldn't find a deal based on what they were offered.

Was Monty looking to set the market for follically challenged coaches?
Theoretically he could if he wanted to. 120-41-23 record as head coach with 2 playoff appearances and a series win. On paper he was one of the better coaches in the league.

Why Sweeney tried to say the extension forced his hand rather than the team clearly tuning him out makes no sense to me. I don't have a problem with letting the guy go if you think it's better for the team. I do have a problem though if you based it on being a cheapass. If negotiations went this poorly, Monty's sudden detachment and lack of care kinda makes sense now.

f*** off, Sweeney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: capecodder

Johnny Upton

Registered User
Jul 5, 2003
340
335
Boston
It was slightly before my time so I might be wrong and an open to correction by those who were watching regularly from 91-94, but a few months back I watched some of the 1992 playoffs on YouTube and what was clear in the interviews and such was that that team LOVED Rick Bowness and would skate through a wall for him. He did nothing to deserve losing his job other than the fact that a big shot name in Sutter hit the market and Harry wanted to lock him in. Makes me wonder if they have different results if they didn't pursue Sutter and kept Rick Bowness for the mid-90s.
Rick Bowness got hosed, that 1991-92 team had an insane number of man-games lost to injury (something like 500+ games) and he still made the conference finals. He deserved another shot.
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,426
41,790
Rick Bowness got hosed, that 1991-92 team had an insane number of man-games lost to injury (something like 500+ games) and he still made the conference finals. He deserved another shot.
And like half their young impact players joined the team after the Olympics and Oates came in toward the deadline, so the whole season record is misleading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and BMC

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad