Casey Jones
Registered User
- Sep 22, 2009
- 201
- 146
You shouldn’t forecast playoff success for any team until after the deadline. There are countless examples of teams making in-season moves (big and small) that change the outlook of a team. Post-deadline results mean more because that’s the team you have in the playoffs. This stretch assures additional moves are going to be made.What the heck does this mean?
If you're a betting man, do those look like factoids that give you confidence that this team can make a long run?
Yes yes there are examples of teams that have done some really poor things in the regular season that went on to have a lot of playoff success. There are exceptions to everything.
This team looks way too inconsistent to make a run. Absolutely several other teams look better in totality and could dispatch them. End of story.Yes, this team can absolutely, without any doubt, make a run. Not a single team in the east looks unbeatable. End of story.
I'm not projecting. I'm speaking on as things stand today. Obviously if things change then my outlook changes.You shouldn’t forecast playoff success for any team until after the deadline. There are countless examples of teams making in-season moves (big and small) that change the outlook of a team. Post-deadline results mean more because that’s the team you have in the playoffs. This stretch assures additional moves are going to be made.
Though the other thing is this stretch may mean a tougher path in the playoffs.
How about our odds for 2nd place and 3rd place?Going by Hockeyviz’s first round matchup probabilities going into today the odds at winning the division we’re about 24% today’s results probably brings down to the 18-20% range.
I feel like a guy like Granlund has to be a priority to add. Being able to pop him into a 3c role and letting Haula sit on the 4th line would be amazing. Really want a guy who can push some offense in the bottom 6 and maybe help unlock Mercer a bit
How about our odds for 2nd place and 3rd place?
I don't like using hockeyviz, only because I don't know how to access the most recent results and I always open the page on some past results and have to fast forward several days to get to the current date every time I go there.
But I think we were like 39% to finish in 2nd and 38% to finish in 3rd on moneypuck coming into today. I'd have to think today's results swapped those numbers, And whatever happens with the Canes will have an effect.
I feel like a guy like Granlund has to be a priority to add. Being able to pop him into a 3c role and letting Haula sit on the 4th line would be amazing. Really want a guy who can push some offense in the bottom 6 and maybe help unlock Mercer a bit
How about our odds for 2nd place and 3rd place?
I don't like using hockeyviz, only because I don't know how to access the most recent results and I always open the page on some past results and have to fast forward several days to get to the current date every time I go there.
But I think we were like 39% to finish in 2nd and 38% to finish in 3rd on moneypuck coming into today. I'd have to think today's results swapped those numbers, And whatever happens with the Canes tonight will have an effect.
Devils-Rangers next week is going to be an elite turd bowl.
The exact thing that happened is the worry with playing those guys late which is the lack of foot speed and SJ turning them and going the other way for a late chance. Again, a lot of bullshit happened on the way to the goal being scored but yeah lol
This team looks way too inconsistent to make a run. Absolutely several other teams look better in totality and could dispatch them. End of story.
See I can do that too.
I'm not projecting. I'm speaking on as things stand today. Obviously if things change then my outlook changes.
No interest in Granlund. Granlund's raw production is inflated by the PP and playing 21 minutes a night. You're paying the price for a guy on a 70 pt pace that won't be anywhere near a 70 pt pace on your team. He has the same amount of 5v5 pts as Hall and Hall isn't one of the absolute worst defensive forwards in the league. Want absolutely nothing to do with Granlund.
I didn't say they would be this bad all season. If that were to happen they'd sink to WC or worse.They're still 5th in P% in the East while being on a L4, they're not gonna stay this bad the whole year lmao. This is where Fitz's being complacent can't kick in or else they're actually toast.
No, I don’t see.This team looks way too inconsistent to make a run. Absolutely several other teams look better in totality and could dispatch them. End of story.
See I can do that too.
Well you've demonstrated plenty of times in the past that you see only what you want to see, so I guess that makes sense.No, I don’t see.
I didn't say they would be this bad all season. If that were to happen they'd sink to WC or worse.
I'm speaking with the 42 games in totality...as of now what I've seen doesn't inspire a ton of confidence in a long run. Like I said, if things change at some point and they show me more for a consistent stretch (whether that's due to roster adjustments or whatever else) then I'll change my tune.
No interest in Granlund. Granlund's raw production is inflated by the PP and playing 21 minutes a night. You're paying the price for a guy on a 70 pt pace that won't be anywhere near a 70 pt pace on your team. He has the same amount of 5v5 pts as Hall and Hall isn't one of the absolute worst defensive forwards in the league. Want absolutely nothing to do with Granlund.
There are not a lot of options for a 3c, and I think I'd rather target that than a winger. I don't think Gourde is going to drive offense in the bottom 6. Unless there's a winger available that will actually drive a line offensively in the bottom 6. I'm trying to think of another center who may be available who may actually push some offense
Jesus Christ.I hate to be that asshole, but I'm totally feeling a Cody Ceci game winner in regulation.
Or some other bum we didn't realize was still in the league. How about Jan Rutta? How about Vlasic himself?