Question.
Let’s say MM is back next season
Does that mean he is really not as good as some here might think, since teams are not offering much for him?
No, it does not. And anyone who tells you differently is
objectively incorrect.
One could say that it's
possible that other teams didn't value him in that manner. But at the end of the day, Mitch Marner controls where he plays next year. Not Treliving. Not other teams who might have interest. The only way one could make a statement or judgement like this would be to understand the inner machinations of how the team and player approached the offseason, which we likely never will short of Marner being traded.
Him being here next year means one of three possible things:
1) We never asked because we never actually wanted to move him.
2) Mitch communicated to us that he is unwilling to waive and thus we didn't explore it further.
3) Mitch was willing to move and we couldn't find a deal.
Mitch being present on the team next year doesn't in any way tell us which of three reasons it was.