You got things backwards. Souring relationships is the Marner camp specialty.
Mitch Marner, Yet Again
- Thread starter SoupNazi
- Start date
The poster is repeatedly saying that
1.) Marner is similar to Drai and should be paid as such (but probably less because Drai took 15.9% of the cap)
2.) this is NOT true because he is comparing Drai taking 14 and claiming it is based on an 88.5 cap and Marner would be taking less because it was a 95.5 cap in the same year.
both contracts start next year
3.) that he claims that Marner is better and should be paid more than pasta and rantanen and similar to Matthews/drai.
4.) that Marner was held back because he had to play with JVR and bozak when “pretty much everyone else” got to play with better players as rookies in the NHL
The only player held back in the first couple seasons was maybe Willy.
Matthews scored 40 in his first season and paced for more than 40 in the two subsequent seasons. He wasn’t held back at all by Hyman, Brown or Willy. Auston was held back because he couldn’t stay healthy and then was afraid of contact for 2 years.
Both Auston and Mitch were placed in the best position to succeed. Man I’m having flash backs to Willy and Auston in the PP scoring cross ice one timers.. what a freaking time that was.
I wouldn’t say Willy was held bacc he just didn’t put it together as fast as the other two
There you go, all I’m saying is the argument that’s been between Dekes and Legion is so dumb. They are both wrong. Neither player was held back. They both had a lot of opportunities early in their careers
OR, another quick reminder: More evidence of why we tend not to sign Toronto-born players as often as, say, Montreal signs Quebec-born ones... Because the fans and the media turn on Toronto-born players MUCH faster than anyone else. Seriously, you're going to drive Marner and Tavares out of town and then try to convince Sam Bennett it would be great for his career to sign here? Or McDavid in a year? Why, so the fans and the media can rip them apart too?
I suspect if the Leafs let Marner go after the circus that has been the last couple of years with this fanbase and this media, it'll be years before they can sign UFA's without massive overpayments. It certainly wouldn't be the first time UFA's actively avoided this team due to factors other than the team...
I find it hard to believe Drai's agent (or any agent) didn't have solid intel last summer and fall about what the 25-26 cap would be. It's part of their job to know.
Was Tavares a wuss for leaving the island and signing with us? What about Chara leaving Ottawa and signing with Boston? Or hossa leaving PIT to sign in DET, then eventually Chicago and winning? Or was Jack Eichel a wuss for demanding a trade? Or how about Matthew Tkachuk? You gotta keep it consistent.
Fair point but marner is born and raised here it’s kinda different but he was given the opportunity to control his destiny for us that’s not good but he got it though
Marner hasn’t asked for a trade, all he’s doing is just exploring his options as a UFA, which is a CBA right. The leafs have benefitted from that when Tavares, Tanev, OEL and Bunting came here and even Marleau. So yeah it sucks he’s electing to potentially do the same but we have been the beneficiaries of the same exact process.
So according to your version of events (I've heard several others) he let Marner know that he was willing to trade him for a better player making $12M. I.e., showed that he thinks Marner is worth less than $12M.
I would say that was a very smart move.
Last edited:
Why do the Leafs own Marner’s rights until July 1st if it’s the offseason and his contract is effectively over?
It is if you consider Marner a net negative in the playoffs like I do. His game is just way to weak and this organization can't make up it's mind on how they want to construct a team.
To put it mildly. MLSE are a bunch of finger painters. Mental midgets etc.
There is only 1 way to not hone any success with these picks. AM MM WN +++ Dermot over Aho, heck Werenski and Barzal was the proposed trade down for Mitch. Anyways, it's Incompetence.
Ps.
You know why MMs production goes down in the playoffs right? ITS BECAUSE MITCH MARNER CAN NOT UP HIS GAME RELATIVE TO COMPETITION. THEY GET BETTER AND HE STAYS THE SAME.
It was well known and agreed that it would be 92.5 at minimum
That was public. Whether they had more accurate info is likely. But I can’t prove it
I think the reported range was 92.5 to 94.5 or 95. They probably knew it was going to be 94 or so which translates to what moving up to 96m? Couple hundred K? Not significant. He locked his money in.
Nonsense. Nobody's driving Marner or anyone else out of town. Maybe you missed it but the man just recently said he's treated like a god here. There were a few people saying he would be bood this season, you know that never happened right? You seem to be ignoring it but the upside of staying is massive. He'll likely think about what he wants, then discuss it with his family, maybe a few close friends and then decide and the fact that a small portion of the fanbase is critical of his playoff performance is a non-factor.
The biggest circus here was when Ballard owned the team and guys like Sittler, McDonald, Salming, Clark, Palmateer, Gilmour that played in his time are legends now. Sittler, McDonald, Salming, Clark, Palmateer, Gilmour, all those guys are immortal in this town and none of them ever even made it to the finals here.
The vast majority of the fan base doesn't think analytically, even among the people that post here there are a ton of people who worship the ground Marner walks on. Win two playoff rounds, that's all it will take and the current group will have 99.9% of the fanbase on their side and the circus will turn into one big worship fest. If Marner leaves, it'll be because he thinks that's not possible to do, and only a wuss would give up like that. Someone with any gumption at all would say of course we're going to break through, just watch me.
