Antropovsky
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2007
- 14,650
- 9,243
6' 180 is small. Nylander is 6' 200. Nobody would call Nylander big.People talk about his size being the issue but 6'0 180 isn't that small. I've seen people call him "smurf" among other things and I don't get it. How was someone like pat kane so effective in the playoffs and how is someone like marchand so effective in the playoffs?
20lbs difference is significant and would certainly help Marner in all areas of the ice.