I already stated it, it's good.
Yea he very clearly was. Both guys have some* fans that are way over the top and seem more interested in the players than the team. I don't even think either of them are that bad but most people will not stand up to an overbearing father figure trying to live vicariously through his son in that situation. Michael Nylander had a pretty bad reputation around the league it seems.
his dad was very clearly involved though in the contract situation. There's a lot of supporting media coverage for this if you want to dig through it, probably just as much as there is for Paul Marner being involved in Marner's career. I highly doubt a 22 year old Nylander wanted to risk missing a whole season of hockey because he was getting 6 million instead of 6.9 million. He set the record for the longest holdout in the cap era. I don't blame either Marner or Nylander for how they handled the contract situations and assume overbearing/narcissistic fathers more so for several reasons anyway but if we're calling a spade a spade, the precedent was set by William/his team in all of this to never negotiate, never bend, and never sacrifice a little in contract for the team.