Proposal: Mitch Marner for Brock Boeser. Potched eggs on toast!

[BigDaddyLurch]

I get what you are attempting to say, but you failed miserably doing so. Marner has played in 9 rounds of playoff hockey, Boeser has played in 5.

It's also not relevant. Boeser was the 5th best for his team in points for 2020 covid bubble.

...the reference was to the Playoff Rounds themselves:

Marner:
1st Round - 8 times
2nd Round - 1 time

Boeser:
1st Round - 2 times
2nd Round - 2 times
3rd Round - 1 time

 

[Dr Amazing]

Lol No. that's not gonna happen.

 

[I am Canadian]

...the reference was to the Playoff Rounds themselves:

Marner:
1st Round - 8 times
2nd Round - 1 time

Boeser:
1st Round - 2 times
2nd Round - 2 times
3rd Round - 1 time

In 8 years Boser has made the playoffs only twice with the Canucks.

Marner has made the playoffs 8 years in a row, while leading the team in regular season scoring (4 times) and playoff scoring (2 times).

The fact that Boeser made it through to the 3rd round (during the Covid bubble no less) as a secondary scorer does not make him at all comparable to Marner.

 

[The Hockey Tonk Man]

Well. That’s a bad trade

 

[Schennanigans]

Nowhere near enough value for Toronto to do that trade. Marner is not getting traded so pointless thread. Leafs are in 1st place, Marner is having a career year.

 

[mydnyte]

Marner (with an extension) for Pettersson would be a more 'realistic' trade.
then you could argue C vs RW and the fact that Marner would be on the topo PP and PK and likely have the highest ice time among forwards if he were there, while Pettersson would flourish as a #2C depending on who plays on his wing, because when you remove Marner, Nylander moves up, and the Leafs winger depth is not as strong, as he'd likely be looking at Domi-McMann as wingers which is not ideal.

Dont think Vancouver has the C depth or the Leafs on the wings to consider it anyways. ...value wise its close though.

Similar deal would be Rantannan (more of a goal scorer and less on D compared to Marner) for Pettersson

 

[Regal]

Marner (with an extension) for Pettersson would be a more 'realistic' trade.
then you could argue C vs RW and the fact that Marner would be on the topo PP and PK and likely have the highest ice time among forwards if he were there, while Pettersson would flourish as a #2C depending on who plays on his wing, because when you remove Marner, Nylander moves up, and the Leafs winger depth is not as strong, as he'd likely be looking at Domi-McMann as wingers which is not ideal.

Dont think Vancouver has the C depth or the Leafs on the wings to consider it anyways. ...value wise its close though.

Similar deal would be Rantannan (more of a goal scorer and less on D compared to Marner) for Pettersson

I think the Canucks take that and run at this point, even without a C option. Marner’s caveat is the playoffs, but Petey sucked there last year anyway, and Marner’s regular season consistency year to year is so much greater than Pettersson’s. Marner is kind of one of the quasi-C wingers anyway like a Kane or Gaudreau where the offense runs through him and the C next to him doesn’t have to be a play-driver