Hallonbroder
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2024
- 22
- 12
Eh? Alright, I’ll give upHe's built perfectly fine for the playoffs, and he does perform.
Eh? Alright, I’ll give upHe's built perfectly fine for the playoffs, and he does perform.
Bennett would be fantastic but the time to add him was when he was in Calgary, not overpaying for his declining years as a UFA.With all of the media attention, I could see Bennett getting suspended at a far greater pace if he were to play for Toronto.
Our top playoff producer in the Matthews era. Elite defensively. Plays in all situations and the toughest matchups, and outplays and outscores his opposition year after year.Eh? Alright, I’ll give up
Is not going to do here what he's done in Florida. He was part of a team culture that facilitated his game and he had the right linemates.He's a 25 goal scorer and a difference make in the playoffs while Mitch is a 16 goal scorer who disappears deeper into a series. For me, now way am I paying Marner $13m.
Why are you and some others saying that people demand defense? Couldn’t you use Marners potential 13-14 mil on top 9-forwards instead, so that you can stop relying on the likes of Holmberg. Minten, Robertson and others year after year? (because management spends it all on a couple of forwards)
Fine - how am I wrong on him?
Bennett @ $7m + $6m in cap space or Marner @ $13m?
Yup because they've been so successful in the playoffs. Imagine what he would be asking for if he helped win a few rounds. Instead he is remembered for pucks over the glass penalties, crying in the penalty box, throwing a hissy fit on the bench, complaining to refs when he is touched, and critical giveaways leading to goals.Marner all day even if 13 is being too rich.. these takes..
This is always the answer when somebody has no actual justification for the move that they're advocating for. Not winning the cup yet isn't a reason to make us worse.Yup because they've been so successful in the playoffs.
The same, because contracts aren't based on team round wins.Imagine what he would be asking for if he helped win a few rounds.
Bennett would be suspended the entire series in game 1 if he was a Leaf, guy routinely charges players, headshots guys, boards guys without getting called for it. One of the fakest tough guys in the league, effective but certainly gets away with a lot of garbage.He's a 25 goal scorer and a difference make in the playoffs while Mitch is a 16 goal scorer who disappears deeper into a series. For me, now way am I paying Marner $13m.
These takes.Marner all day even if 13 is being too rich.. these takes..
the second bennett were to become a leaf he would be "kadri'd" and wouldn't see the playoffsBennett has never cracked 50 points, he's a decent player but not even close. If he was actually officiated properly he would have been suspended multiple times in the playoffs.
I would definitely go hard for Bennett. I lobbied for him here a couple of years ago.Lol @Marner asking for $14m.
I send him on his way and go hard for UFAs Bennet and Ekblad.
Those guys make us better and more balanced than Marner, regardless of what Marner does or doesn’t do in the playoffs.
For a guy who says how much he loves playing in his hometown and wants to stay, his contract negotiation history points in the opposite direction.
These takes.
How much would you pay JT?
I have stated JT is worth up to7 per year, many here have stated 5 some as low as 3 lmao
Not once has Marner got 20 more points than JT in a single season and a couple of times Marner only got 6 more.
So how much more than JT are you willing to give Mitch for those 20 points max a year.
Ignoring the fact I’ve said every year JT has been here, staying healthy is part of the plan. Nice in avoiding the question how much more per year is Marner worth.What does JT have to do with anything being discussed here? Ignoring the games Marner missed to close the gap in points is some solid cherry picking though.
Anyone with eyeballs can see that Marner drives the offensive play much moreso than JT, and outside of faceoffs, Marner is relied upon more defensively too.
Bennett would be suspended the entire series in game 1 if he was a Leaf, guy routinely charges players, headshots guys, boards guys without getting called for it. One of the fakest tough guys in the league, effective but certainly gets away with a lot of garbage.
Bennett is the kind of guy you add to take your team over the top, he isn't that core guy you build around. Marner literally doubles his offensive production, obviously Marner has been horrible in the playoffs, but Bennett just isn't that guy lol.
If we're talking Tkachuk, a power forward who chips in offensively, different story. Bennett is a good middle 6 player, Marner is a top line player.
Ignoring the fact I’ve said every year JT has been here, staying healthy is part of the plan. Nice in avoiding the question how much more per year is Marner worth.
I don’t believe Ekblad is still a $9 million defender, and I believe that is what the market will show as well.Ekblad will command at least 9 million. Bennett will get 7, he’s better than Chandler Stephenson IMO. So I don’t think we can afford both and honestly, why do we want Ekblad? He’s 30 years old and suffers a major injury every year.
I don’t believe Ekblad is still a $9 million defender, and I believe that is what the market will show as well.
No interest in him over $6-7 million. Our defence is already well improved.
Point being made here is even with Marner, our roster has holes.
$14m to Marner vs adding elsewhere to improve other areas is something some people here can’t comprehend or just refuse to accept. It would be amusing if it weren’t how mindless it appears to be.
Team first, player much less.
?He's built perfectly fine for the playoffs, and he does perform.
If paying ufa prices for your own players it is no different than building through the ufa market. I can think of Reilly giving us a discount but I can’t think of anyone else we have homegrown that gave us a discount.Ekblad will easily get 8 mill + on the open market. He’s a RHD, former first overall, he’s bettter than nurse. So thinking he’s getting 6 mill is kind of foolish. Montour got 7.
Building through UFA has never lead to a Stanley Cup in the modern cap era. You build through buying low on ELC players at their lowest value and they The only exception was Vegas, they also abused LTIR.
If the leafs want to let Marner walk and then use prospect/draft capital and Marner’s cap space to pick up a few young players who could benefit from a change of scenery I’m all for that. The leafs should be looking for the next young Sam Reinhart and Sam Bennett and using assets to acquire those guys.
Thinking some middle aged UFA’s (who you will have to overpay btw) are going to come here and lead you to a Stanley cup is crazy thinking. It’s NEVER happpened in the cap era.
If paying ufa prices for your own players it is no different than building through the ufa market. I can think of Reilly giving us a discount but I can’t think of anyone else we have homegrown that gave us a discount.
Every single roster has "holes". Cup winners have "holes". Welcome to the cap era. That's not a reason to create bigger holes.Point being made here is even with Marner, our roster has holes.
If paying ufa prices for your own players it is no different than building through the ufa market. I can think of Reilly giving us a discount but I can’t think of anyone else we have homegrown that gave us a discount.
Star players are underpaid in the NHL relative to their impact, so even paying them normal UFA prices (which we haven't even done, outside of Nylander) leaves you better off than doing the same with mid-tier UFAs.If paying ufa prices for your own players it is no different than building through the ufa market.