Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Mitch Marner, Again

As a Leaffan and Swede, that goal was sweet and sour. But Sweden was overall better then i thought.
Got hidden capital in Nylander and EP , and why no EK in the overtime?? WTF!
 
Confucius said:
They took us to OT and could have just as easily won as they lost
Click to expand...

They sure did. We are actually lucky that Nylander played so horribly. That loss could be pinned on him.

The problem with Mitch was that he played like he was in quicksand. He was legitimately awful the whole night. It goes 3v3 he has more time and space and he got a goal on a muffin shot that the tender should have had. I am glad we won. Not so glad that because he scored a weak goal, we need to hear about how 13m is a no brainer, and he is now a clutch performer. This is a David Clarkson justification scenario.
 
leafs in five said:
do you ever get tired of being wrong
Click to expand...

He is always wrong
A couple of years ago he made a bet and if he lost he said he wouldn’t post here anymore
Needless to say he lost and actually disappeared for a while as the wave but I’m sure with his integrity he had another account.
So now he is back
He has hated marner from day one. I think Mitch must have wedged him in elementary school and took his lunch money

Mitch could score three goals and win a cup and this guy would criticize him for not scoring 4

No common sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: Confucius, al secord and DarkKnight
thewave said:
They sure did. We are actually lucky that Nylander played so horribly. That loss could be pinned on him.

The problem with Mitch was that he played like he was in quicksand. He was legitimately awful the whole night. It goes 3v3 he has more time and space and he got a goal on a muffin shot that the tender should have had. I am glad we won. Not so glad that because he scored a weak goal, we need to hear about how 13m is a no brainer, and he is now a clutch performer. This is a David Clarkson justification scenario.
Click to expand...
He was OK. Not spectacular. Clutch with the game on his stick. Sure, it could have been different; anything could have been different, but it wasn't.
 
Leaf Fans said:
He was OK. Not spectacular. Clutch with the game on his stick. Sure, it could have been different; anything could have been different, but it wasn't.
Click to expand...
It was a clutch goal on a shot that the tender should have had. He did it though and now we have to listen to how it erases 8 years of poor playoff performances and dispels his relative uselessness in clutch situations. Because it was for Team Canada his rabid superfans are going to relentlessly drone on.

Nice one Mitch. You got a shot on net that went in. You are the hero of the day
 
thewave said:
It was a clutch goal on a shot that the tender should have had. He did it though and now we have to listen to how it erases 8 years of poor playoff performances and dispels his relative uselessness in clutch situations. Because it was for Team Canada his rabid superfans are going to relentlessly drone on.

Nice one Mitch. You got a shot on net that went in. You are the hero of the day
Click to expand...
Coulda, woulda, shoulda, but didn't. We don't have to listen that at all. No one brought in up until you did. Mostly because it is hyperbole.
 
DarkKnight said:
Jon Cooper vs some toxic nobody. Tough call. He does so many great things that hockey people understand is unique. “Mitch can do it all” is right.

People just reveal how sad they are as people, nothing more.
Click to expand...

Marner started that whole play by cutting off a Swedish player at the net and getting Canada possession of the puck, too.
 
  • Love
Reactions: DarkKnight
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom