Miscellaneous NHL Talk Part VII: The Not-So Lazy Hazy Crazy Days Of Summer

Status
Not open for further replies.

drownedsailors

Registered User
Sep 25, 2010
1,950
0
Earth
This year the Conn Smythe seemed to have been awarded for opposite reasons. In 2010, Toews was noticeably great in the first three rounds and was subdued in the Final. This year, outside of his hattrick against the Wings, Kane was pretty poor (for his standards) in the first three rounds, but was incredible in the Final.

Kane was good in the series against the Wild. He didn't score but he set up a lot of the goals. Against Detroit he was alright (bad for his standards) but he got better towards the end of the series. Against LA he was no where to be found until games 4 & 5. But he played absolutely amazing in those games to get the hat trick. He then played incredible in the finals.

I watched every single Blackhawks game and the biggest thing about their team was that there was no clear cut MVP. There were so many players that stepped up in big situations, so it became a question of who stepped up when it mattered the most and that was obviously Kane. Crawford was amazing at times but he also had his struggles and till this day people question whether or not he's a great goaltender or a player that's benefitting from a great team and system. When Quick & Thomas won the Conn Smythe's they were undoubtedly their team's best players and they were considered elite ELITE goalies with inhumane playoff runs. Crawford just didn't have that, and Kane stepped up when it mattered the most, so I can see why they gave it to him.
 
Last edited:

chimrichalds18

the key
Apr 17, 2007
2,775
0
philadelphia
I honestly think the best player in 2010 was Briere... didn't get it because they prefer to hand it to the winning team.

Toews was certainly a deserving winner.

not really. He did absolutely nothing in the finals against us. Keith was more deserving IMO

Pronger was the clear MVP that year. There's no way in hell the Flyers make it that far without him. It's nice that Briere put up all of those points, but our defense was the reason we got as far as we did. That and David Krejci's broken arm.

Keep in mind who Pronger was playing in front of. He was incredible.
 

TheShaneTrain

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
250
47
East Greenville
You know, immediately following last night's game, I said to my girlfriend "I can't even imagine how bruins fans feel right now."

Then i thought about it... game 6, cup finals, at home, brutal collapse to lose the cup to the Chicago Blackhawks.

...Yeah, you won't be getting any pity from me, Boston.
 

JDinkalage Morgoone

U of South Flurrida
Oct 7, 2008
15,010
3
308 Negra Arroyo Ln.
No question the choke was worse.

In game situation? It's close to be honest, but letting up 2 goals in 17 seconds is worse. The Leighton goal is only close because that goal should never go in.

In overall context? Leighton 100x worse because at least the Bruins have a cup within the last 2 years. How gutted did you feel as a Flyers fan in 2010 with nothing to fall back on?
 

Halladay

Registered User
Feb 27, 2009
66,325
8,339
H Town
I have no clue what happened. I saw Lucic score, then I turned the channel at the under 6 timeout to Star Trek and when I turn it back they are shaking hands. I was in shock.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,985
45,390
Also, much rather lose the way we did than the way the Bruins did. Although, they have a Cup from just 2 years ago to not feel as bad about it

I think losing on the softest OT goal ever conceded was worse.
 

might2mash

Post-apocalyptic
Oct 22, 2007
4,619
0
South Bend
In overall context? Leighton 100x worse because at least the Bruins have a cup within the last 2 years. How gutted did you feel as a Flyers fan in 2010 with nothing to fall back on?
Seriously. Even many of the Bruins players looked like they were smiling sincerely during the handshake line, obviously not happy with the result but not as completely drained and disheartened as our guys were in 2010.
 

nevermore

Cap space since 2005
Oct 25, 2007
12,238
262
Personally I prefer the MFL debacle over what happened last night (disregarding 2011).

a) Because without Leighton's gaffe they still would've continued playing the game and maybe lost it anyway. The Bruins on the other hand were on their way back to Chicago.
b) The ridiculousness of it all actually made to loss bearable to me. I was just sitting there laughing at what I just witnessed, it was that stupid. I actually got over that loss really quickly. That wouldn't have happened with yesterday's result.
 

RJ8812*

Guest
Carcillo will get his name on the Cup; the Hawks can request exemptions and they'll do it for him since he missed out by one regular season game.
So happy for Zeus; should have happened in 2004, but nice to see in 2013.

I'm blown away that they gave Kane the Conn Smythe; he was virtually invisible for two and a half rounds. Keith and Crawford were consistently great throughout the playoffs.

that's not true

He has to play in half the regular season games, as well as one Stanley Cup Final game

He did neither. However, they can still petition to get his name on The Cup

Also, losing it the way the Bruins lost was a million times worse than how we lost it.
 

MiamiScreamingEagles

Global Moderator
Jan 17, 2004
71,925
48,559
Really happy Handzus got a cup! The guy is an awesome player and guy, and gave his all for the Flyers.

Two reasons why I hoped the Flyers would consider signing him as a free agent a couple of years ago: his strength on faceoffs and his abilities in shootouts.
 
Last edited:

JustJim

Registered User
Feb 20, 2012
409
1
Paignton,UK
Jeremy-Roenick-crying.jpg

Liked him as a player, but I think he's an asshat as a colour man!
 

Jtown

Registered User
Oct 6, 2010
39,619
19,685
Fairfax, Virginia
I think losing on the softest OT goal ever conceded was worse.

No way, That Bruins loss was stunning. When kane scored i was in disbelief for 20 minutes straight. DIdn't even get off the couch.

Im still in shock over the bruins loss and they aren't even my team.
 

SolidSnakeUS

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2009
49,499
13,342
Baldwinsville, NY
Oh that didn't even cross my mind. Decent movie IMO. Wanna see the 2nd one before it leaves theaters but I don't know if that's gonna happen.

Just go see it. Actually, before you go see that, watch The Wrath of Khan (still think it's the best Star Trek movie, but still).

My dad was watching that movie as well on FX before the game started.
 

FlyersFan61290

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
9,665
17
Philadelphia
Just go see it. Actually, before you go see that, watch The Wrath of Khan (still think it's the best Star Trek movie, but still).

My dad was watching that movie as well on FX before the game started.

I've seen Star Trek II (?) in the past but if maybe I'll re-watch it before I see Into Darkness.
 

FlyersFan61290

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
9,665
17
Philadelphia
Get the Blu-ray of it. It's a true HD remastering where they went back and got the original negatives to make it true 1080p. It's pretty damn sweet.

Only 13 bucks on amazon so I just ordered it. I've been getting TNG seasons remastered as they've been coming out so I have no doubt it's worth the 13 dollars :laugh:. There are comparison videos on YouTube if at all interested (TNG). The difference in quality, it's truly amazing.
 

SolidSnakeUS

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 13, 2009
49,499
13,342
Baldwinsville, NY
Only 13 bucks on amazon so I just ordered it. I've been getting TNG seasons remastered as they've been coming out so I have no doubt it's worth the 13 dollars :laugh:. There are comparison videos on YouTube if at all interested (TNG). The difference in quality, it's truly amazing.

I seriously almost bought the first 3 seasons and all of TOS for like $200 for the Blu-ray copies when they were all at least 50% off on Amazon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad