drownedsailors
Registered User
This year the Conn Smythe seemed to have been awarded for opposite reasons. In 2010, Toews was noticeably great in the first three rounds and was subdued in the Final. This year, outside of his hattrick against the Wings, Kane was pretty poor (for his standards) in the first three rounds, but was incredible in the Final.
Kane was good in the series against the Wild. He didn't score but he set up a lot of the goals. Against Detroit he was alright (bad for his standards) but he got better towards the end of the series. Against LA he was no where to be found until games 4 & 5. But he played absolutely amazing in those games to get the hat trick. He then played incredible in the finals.
I watched every single Blackhawks game and the biggest thing about their team was that there was no clear cut MVP. There were so many players that stepped up in big situations, so it became a question of who stepped up when it mattered the most and that was obviously Kane. Crawford was amazing at times but he also had his struggles and till this day people question whether or not he's a great goaltender or a player that's benefitting from a great team and system. When Quick & Thomas won the Conn Smythe's they were undoubtedly their team's best players and they were considered elite ELITE goalies with inhumane playoff runs. Crawford just didn't have that, and Kane stepped up when it mattered the most, so I can see why they gave it to him.
Last edited: