NHL Talk Miscellaneous NHL Discussion CIX: Processing a Tremendous Amount of Insane Information

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
194,047
44,088
The Kings also won with Lombardi considering actively blowing it, followed by him successfully blowing it shortly after. Their specific modus operandi happened to align perfectly with a shift in the sport that favored how they were built and played, too. That shift went the opposite way and they didn't even try to adapt. Pretending you can build like that deliberately is silly.

It's like citing the Blues as a meaningful model you can recreate. They're what, the only team that has ever won following their model? And it was one-off contention.
Lombardi was very close to getting fired in 2012.

They were analytical darlings though.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

Chicken N Raffls

Here for the chaos and lolz
Nov 7, 2022
3,968
8,163
Douglassville
Probably not. But they paid a fine price for what he is. It’s basically impossible to lose this trade. Stranger things have happened. Maybe he’s Bennett, maybe he’s perma-plateaued. I’m very much OK with continually taking low risk bets like this over trading comparable value for Erik Johnson and re-signing Seeler. I think it’s somewhat fitting it’s an expansion team that acquired him.



Their Giroux target. Maybe they preferred him to Tippett! Even the trades they don’t make showcase they don’t know what they’re looking for. Do we ever get reports of the Flyers being in on a good target?

Shea Weber?
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,462
22,424
Kakko has limited upside, below average speed, doesn't seem especially skillful.
Maybe he can become more consistent and be a solid 3RW.
Flyers wouldn't have been interested with their logjam at RW and desire for more, not less, speed.
 

Lord Defect

Secretary of Blowtorching
Nov 13, 2013
19,098
35,198
Kakko has limited upside, below average speed, doesn't seem especially skillful.
Maybe he can become more consistent and be a solid 3RW.
Flyers wouldn't have been interested with their logjam at RW and desire for more, not less, speed.
You’re telling me you wouldn’t want a 23 year old #2 overall that has just over a year on his contract as trade bait in the off season or next trade deadline while you’re rebuilding?
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,462
22,424
You’re telling me you wouldn’t want a 23 year old #2 overall that has just over a year on his contract as trade bait in the off season or next trade deadline while you’re rebuilding?
Trade bait? He's going to be a RFA, and he just got traded for a 3rd pair D-man and a 3rd rd pick.
What are the odds he's worth that much in a year?
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,462
22,424
-0.97 (xGA-GA/60). That's peak Shesterkin good.
Which is probably why it's unsustainable.
He's a solid prospect, but nothing in his past suggests elite goalie.
Last year +0.21.
 

freakydallas13

Registered User
Jan 30, 2007
7,692
18,862
Vancouver
-0.97 (xGA-GA/60). That's peak Shesterkin good.
Which is probably why it's unsustainable.
He's a solid prospect, but nothing in his past suggests elite goalie.
Last year +0.21.
Maybe if you explain nicely to Dostal that he wasn't this good in the past, he'll correct this egregious oversight and play the way your spreadsheet tells him to.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BiggE

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad