deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 51,398
- 22,397
The Bruins:Pittsburgh says hi.
In the cap era, those 4 teams have won 10 of the 19 Cups and were in the finals without winning 3 times.
That doesn't account for the Bruins and they won one Cup with 2 more finals appearances or other teams with a Cup win and a finals appearance like Detroit, Florida or Vegas.
One and done in the Finals is more the exception than the rule.
Top players on the Cup team:
Lucic #50
Krejci #63
Bergeron #45
Horton, T 1st, 3rd, Wideman
Recchi (42), T with 2nd for Karsums and Lashoff
Ryder - FA, 2008
Marchand #71
Chara - FA, 2006
Seidenberg - T, 2nd rd
Kaberle - T, 1st, 2nd
Boychuck - T, Hendricks
Thomas G
Top players from 2019 team, SC Finals
Marchand
Pastrnak #25
Bergeron
Krejci
DeBrusk #14
Heinen #116
Kuraly, T with 1st for Marvin Jones G
Backes, FA 2016
Wagner, FA 2018
McAvoy #14
Carlo #37
Chara
Krug UDFA
Grzelcyk #85
Rask G
Or having a pipeline that arrives when your older cohort ages out.I hate the way these things are phrased by both sides.
My position is always and forever this -- All progress made by your org as a result of players who will still solidly be in their prime when you're next ready to contend is good. All progress made by others would be better served taking another route.
It's not about tanking or not. It is about locking into a core on the same timeline.
Top teams tend to have a core in their mid-20s, but a few solid starters in their early 30s or so.