What percentages would you assign to "good", "meh, and "bad" if you were to evaluate his tenure here?
And when I say the Greenway move was bad, it's not just about his disappointing on ice performance (the inconsistency, mainly), it's that we're already struggling to make the cap work, and given his issues, he's a luxury moreso than a need at 3M. If we were working with a full 81.5M in cap space? Sure it's a fine contract. But given our situation, we should have gotten assets for him and let someone else bet on that.
Greenway was kept because Ek struggled without him
Foligno struggled without him
They struggled without each other
Our pk has been poor because for whatever reason, all three players can't play with others and communicate
So what is exactly greenway issue? Yes, he's very inconsistent. when people say he gets pushed around, I will push back and say he gets taken down with dirty hits, and others hits on him , or blatant interference that should led to penalties for wild but it doesn't
As far as what I consider to be relatively "major" moves...
Good, varying degrees:
Zucker trade
Kaprizov extension
Foligno extension
Hartman extension
Brodin extension
Kulikov signing
Parise buyout
Unsure:
Spurgeon extension (yes, putting that in here for now, instead of "bad", but I understand why people would disagree)
Eriksson Ek extension (closer to good than the alternative though)
Greenway extension
Kunin trade (heavily dependent on Marat)
Not a fan:
Fiala contract situation
Suter buyout + Goligoski signing
Might have missed one or two.
Very Much disagree with you on suter. He and Parise were a cancer, and it seems they didn't gel with dumba, and several other wild teammates.
Is fiala worth 9mil like kaprizov zdx? I have begun to wonder whether he's not coming off that which is why there hasn't been one reports of extension talks?
Eriksson signing is great
Kunin would have been lost in expansion. (Yes, you are right it depends on Marat)