PettersonHughes
Registered User
- Aug 26, 2020
- 1,700
- 714
Watch Tampa win this year and get Miller back for a run at a 4 peat
We'll take Cernak, plus either Cirelli or Colton, plus an early pick (at least a 2nd), thanks.
Watch Tampa win this year and get Miller back for a run at a 4 peat
That's weird -- Bernmeister said the exact opposite.Rangers don't have the cap to offer him a big, long term contract. If NYR were getting Miller, they missed the window since they would have wanted him for this current playoffs. This is a 1 year 2C bandaid if Rangers made the trade. Or it's a 1 year 1RW bandaid as they then need a 2C.
Possibly. I didn’t include them without knowing if Bergeron is coming back. If Big Berg comes back, I could see them in the mix too. If he doesn’t, Boston probably wouldn’t want to give up a ton of future for Miller not knowing how their season will go.
It just makes sense, Im just a neutral fan commentating on an appropriate trade
Its a weird feeling when we are used to going all in after being a bottom 10 team for years and constantly losing more and more draft picks with a drafting "guru" lolMy brain feels like falling out after starting to believe we may have competent management.
Two problems with this. First the deal wouldn't just involve Nylander, Vancouver fans want Liljegren, a first and probably another piece which is crazy. Second Miller is 29 now and will be 30 this upcoming season, if hes looking for a 6 or 7 year deal he will be payed 8.5 to 9 million when he's 34, 35, and 36 years old. Not a recipe for success any way you slice it.No one knows how much Miller is asking for (I'd figure it's in the Hertl-Landeskog-Zibanajed range but adjust for age), but with Nylander just a hair under $7M you're only looking at needing an extra $1-$1.5M against the cap starting the 23-24 season, not too hard to find and can probably be covered with cap inflation.
Leafs can't trade for Miller and resign him time to move on to the maybe 4 or 5 other teams that have interest, the assets, the ability to resign Miller, and the appropriate time line for contention. The above criteria hints to not a very large market so the Canucks should get this done sooner rather then later or he becomes a true rental.Every trade thread : Leafs fans demanding that their offer is best and other team must take it.
Other team's fans : we don't agree.
Leafs fans : We don't care.
How many times does this cycle has to continue????
It's good to want things, in reality it's unlikely to happenWe'll want one of Clarke or Byfield.
Kings do not need 29-year-old player who wants long and expensive contract.
They will contend in 2 years maybe, not now.
Can you elaborate on what a LAK contending team in two years looks like? Is it a Danault led forward group that includes Byfield and Turcotte down the middle, an even older Doughty on defence and Petersen in net? Or are you counting on signing quality UFAs, or other prospects that are going to step in and be immediate all-stars like Clarke?Kings do not need 29-year-old player who wants long and expensive contract.
They will contend in 2 years maybe, not now.
Let me try:Can you elaborate on what a LAK contending team in two years looks like? Is it a Danault led forward group that includes Byfield and Turcotte down the middle, an even older Doughty on defence and Petersen in net? Or are you counting on signing quality UFAs, or other prospects that are going to step in and be immediate all-stars like Clarke?
It seems like you almost beat a team that is going to the final 4 this year, and wouldn't you want to capitalize on the window that includes Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick while they're still very good players?
Assuming a young core could come in and lead the team to the SCF is pretty optimistic in my opinion.
Although I did not mention JT Miller at all in this post, I am expecting a 'we no want old expensive contract' response, but please, prove me wrong!
They already won two cups with that core of veterans so it's not like there's a dire urgency to go all-in right now to gift those veterans one final chance at winning a cup they never experienced.Can you elaborate on what a LAK contending team in two years looks like? Is it a Danault led forward group that includes Byfield and Turcotte down the middle, an even older Doughty on defence and Petersen in net? Or are you counting on signing quality UFAs, or other prospects that are going to step in and be immediate all-stars like Clarke?
It seems like you almost beat a team that is going to the final 4 this year, and wouldn't you want to capitalize on the window that includes Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick while they're still very good players?
Assuming a young core could come in and lead the team to the SCF is pretty optimistic in my opinion.
Although I did not mention JT Miller at all in this post, I am expecting a 'we no want old expensive contract' response, but please, prove me wrong!
There is not a player on Vancouvers roster the Avs trade Byram for. He’s so much more valuable than a JT Miller rental. Byram looks exactly like what a star number 1 D man looks like at age 20.core pieces coming back that addresses Vancouver's needs would be
LA - Mikey Anderson. ______then Fagemo, Clarke, ...Kirsanov interesting, not so sold on Turcotte anymore compared to what itll cost to acquire him.
Nashville - Jeannot, Fabbro
Colorado - Newhook, after heavy consultation with medical staff Byram.
Florida - Weegar? Lundell ...one can dream
Columbus - Peeke, Sillinger, Marchenko is interesting
I agree with most of what you said here… I will also state that most teams could use a miller, as well. But you’re right not every team is in the position to make a deal for him and could choose to stand-pat or finish rounding out their rebuild too. Some of the Canucks fans get so focused on teams with the exact prospects and picks we’d want that they forget to look at the bigger picture/ putting themselves in the other teams shoes.They already won two cups with that core of veterans so it's not like there's a dire urgency to go all-in right now to gift those veterans one final chance at winning a cup they never experienced.
What a lot of people forget is that a great amount of a team's improvement comes from the existing players they already have getting more experience and getting older.
You act as if Miller is a godsend to any potential playoff team and said team should happily and easily fork over coveted assets. It's very hard to predict how a team will ultimately improve in a couple of years but with the Kings' youth, there's certainly no rush. They have options just like you and your Canucks and there's no requirement for them to take an expensive gamble on Miller for an all-in move with a very young surrounding cast.
If the Canucks retain on Miller this season and he then re-signs in Toronto, the Leafs don't have to worry about moving Nylander until next off-season if they chose to handle it that way. So, they could take a run at it with both of them this year and then the Leafs could recoup some of the assets lost on Miller and sign Miller long term. Like you said Nylander + salary inflation should cover Miller for the most part. They could also look at Muzzin and a secondary player out for cap space next year.Looking at Toronto they probably need Miller more than most but the problem is they can only keep him as a rental while if the report of a strong market for Miller is to believed other teams will be looking to sign and trade. So doesn't seem like it would work... but I'm wondering if you could get creative and make it a 3-way trade where Nylander passes through to the 3rd team. Nylander is a solid player but Vancouver's new management will be trying to clean up Jim Benning's mess clearing salary and building the prospect pool back up, but would be attractive to a number of low cap teams looking to step up. On Toronto they could capitalize on a salary retained(?) Miller for one season then extend him at Nylander's cap hit.
What contender in the cap era has a Kopitar level player playing on the third line? That team would have dominated the entire NHL.Let me try:
The window that includes Kopitar is closed already. He is at best third line center on contending team.
Yeah, because it's bullshit. Kopitar might not be a high-end 1C anymore, but he's still very much a first line center. If you're lucky enough to have Kopitar as your 2C and Danault as your 3C, then you've got the best depth in the NHL. Even still, he was a top 20 center in scoring. That's not terrible.What contender in the cap era has a Kopitar level player playing on the third line? That team would have dominated the entire NHL.
That doesn't even take into account you said at best LOL. Including the non cap era, what team in the entire NHl history has ever had a Kopitar (60-70 point player) on their 4th line?!?
Agree with your views. There have been numerous threads between LA and VAN, I've noticed Kinghock usually has the most outlandish takes. Every fanbase has these kinda posters though eh. Its just more prominent since the LA fanbase here is mostly fairly reasonable IMO and Hock is one of the most active Kings fans on these boards.Yeah, because it's bullshit. Kopitar might not be a high-end 1C anymore, but he's still very much a first line center. If you're lucky enough to have Kopitar as your 2C and Danault as your 3C, then you've got the best depth in the NHL. Even still, he was a top 20 center in scoring. That's not terrible.
The problem is that Kopitar's decline could start increasing pace rapidly. It's not a guarantee of course, but he turns 35 next season (how is that even possible?). He's already showed signs of slowing down. LA needs Byfield to start stepping into a 1C role ASAP or there will be a pretty big void when the inevitable occurs.
Still, I'd love for LA's center depth to be Kopitar - Miller - Danault. Three really great lines would be wonderful.
Kempe - Kopitar - Kaliyev
Byfield - Miller - Arvidsson
Moore - Danault - Vilardi
JAD - Lizotte - Grundstrom
If we can do something like Turcotte and Faber for a signed Miller, that would be huge. Sign me up
You have been able to convince Kilowatt to do bad trade for Kings, but I am pretty sure that majority of LA fans still not interested in trade for Miller…Agree with your views. There have been numerous threads between LA and VAN, I've noticed Kinghock usually has the most outlandish takes. Every fanbase has these kinda posters though eh. Its just more prominent since the LA fanbase here is mostly fairly reasonable IMO and Hock is one of the most active Kings fans on these boards.
In terms of a deal. Turcotte is a very high risk high reward option. Faber definitely fits an organizational need. A lot of Canucks fans wanted us to draft him in 2020 with our 2nd before dim Jim traded it to you guys for Tofu.
I dont think those 2 alone would be enough. I believe the Canucks will be looking for a 23 1st and or a 22 2nd as they are very high on the 23 draft (case in point reason why they traded Motte for a 23 pick over a 22). They also have been heavily rumored to be in the market for a 2nd round pick this upcoming draft.
My proposal has usually been a 22 2nd + 23 1st + Turcotte. Id much rather have Faber to Turcotte though.
I get for LA they probably would rather sell some of the prospects they have instead of future picks given they are starting to age out and come to the make or break points in their careers all at the same time.
Turcotte + Faber + Vilardi in that case may get it done
The top rumored offer at the deadline was 22 1st + Lundqvist + Chytil. Turcotte + Faber + Vilardi would be around the same level of an offer.
Agree with your views. There have been numerous threads between LA and VAN, I've noticed Kinghock usually has the most outlandish takes. Every fanbase has these kinda posters though eh. Its just more prominent since the LA fanbase here is mostly fairly reasonable IMO and Hock is one of the most active Kings fans on these boards.
In terms of a deal. Turcotte is a very high risk high reward option. Faber definitely fits an organizational need. A lot of Canucks fans wanted us to draft him in 2020 with our 2nd before dim Jim traded it to you guys for Tofu.
I dont think those 2 alone would be enough. I believe the Canucks will be looking for a 23 1st and or a 22 2nd as they are very high on the 23 draft (case in point reason why they traded Motte for a 23 pick over a 22). They also have been heavily rumored to be in the market for a 2nd round pick this upcoming draft.
My proposal has usually been a 22 2nd + 23 1st + Turcotte. Id much rather have Faber to Turcotte though.
I get for LA they probably would rather sell some of the prospects they have instead of future picks given they are starting to age out and come to the make or break points in their careers all at the same time.
Turcotte + Faber + Vilardi in that case may get it done
The top rumored offer at the deadline was 22 1st + Lundqvist + Chytil. Turcotte + Faber + Vilardi would be around the same level of an offer.
No one's convinced me of anything, I just see who McLellan plays and who McLellan doesn't play. The best case scenario for me is that all the prospects we've drafted are put into top six roles and thrive. Unfortunately, we don't live in fantasy land. Instead, we have guys like Athanasiou and Iafallo playing next to Kopitar for half the season, even though there are other options available. If we're not going to give our prospects playing time in a rebuild, then I'd rather trade them for valuable players who will help us win.You have been able to convince Kilowatt to do bad trade for Kings, but I am pretty sure that majority of LA fans still not interested in trade for Miller…