Player Discussion Mika Zibanejad

Siddi

Rangers Masochist
Mar 8, 2013
8,013
5,733
Global
He's yet to show up at an optional skate. Panarin and Laf have yet to miss one. Now that those two are tasked with getting him going it would be nice to see him show up and participate with his new line mates.

I agree. It is a bad look unless he is dealing with a minor injury we dont know about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slaydagnar

Siddi

Rangers Masochist
Mar 8, 2013
8,013
5,733
Global
Had his best game in a long while against the Islanders centering Panarin and Laf and tonight after 1 period the idiot behind the bench says, nope, not working, time for the blender. I mean how are these guys even going to gel if that dino keeps switching everything around as soon as they hit little adversity?
 

DevilDog99

Registered User
May 5, 2018
156
258
we are literally ruining the team trying to accomodate this loser. Back to the old lines where we have at least three functioning lines. Mikas line should be playing 3rd line minutes bc that is exactly what they are.

No reason to ruin two great scoring lines for this no effort loser.

We need to try to get rid of him one way or another. Guys like this are a cancer in the locker room- that attitude spreads
 

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
28,214
36,706
It's eventually going to come that we will have to buy this guy out. 5 years left after this season, going to suck for the cap hit but he is going to drag this team down for that entire contract if this is how he plays, and he's only going to get worse and worse over the years.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,129
57,013
In High Altitoad
It's eventually going to come that we will have to buy this guy out. 5 years left after this season, going to suck for the cap hit but he is going to drag this team down for that entire contract if this is how he plays, and he's only going to get worse and worse over the years.

He has a buyout proof contract. All the bonuses make it so that you'd essentially be paying him to go away while taking on almost his entire cap hit and then losing some space on the back end of the buyout term as you normally would.

Might as well keep him around and see whether or not he is someone you can shelf on LTIR at some point or see if there is some role where you can find some use for him.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,045
10,734
He has a buyout proof contract. All the bonuses make it so that you'd essentially be paying him to go away while taking on almost his entire cap hit and then losing some space on the back end of the buyout term as you normally would.

Might as well keep him around and see whether or not he is someone you can shelf on LTIR at some point or see if there is some role where you can find some use for him.
Retain would be the only way. You cannot spend 11+ million on a goalie and then buy somebody out for 7ish million on the cap. Retaining on ZIbanejad or some injury would be the only way. Obviously they would try and seek a trade first where they don't need to retain, but right now that doesn't seem likely.
 

noncents

Registered User
Feb 25, 2022
1,472
1,869
Retain would be the only way. You cannot spend 11+ million on a goalie and then buy somebody out for 7ish million on the cap. Retaining on ZIbanejad or some injury would be the only way. Obviously they would try and seek a trade first where they don't need to retain, but right now that doesn't seem likely.
no. movement. clause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRFANMANI

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad