Chytilmania
Registered User
- Dec 31, 2017
- 4,499
- 6,871
Barzal stands OUT whenever we play the Isles. Makes plays, doesn't always work out but he generally is able to drive the net with success and open space for teamates who he finds. Much like Zbad, but you can see the skill and drive to win. Eichel didn't jump out at me in that way when I paid special attention to him this year (can't speak to previous years), I guess he's more finesse and we have enough finesse. Coming off a heavy injury too, no thanksEichel was also on pace to score 8 goals this year in 82 games. He hasn't been able to bring his team close to the POs ever. I have big concerns for him just as I did with Brad Richards. I think he make the most sense for a solid strong team, that doesn't have top end ability. But I would be concerned about how he would do for a team like ours. Would he match-up well against the top lines around us?
I just don't think he is a good counter to guys like Barzal, Aho, even Crosby can be mentioned, Tampa's speed and so forth. If we were talking about like Barzal, I would be willing to go all in without any doubt. But Eichel just doesn't do it at all for me. JMHO.
Come one ola, Eichel for sure drives play. Guy had a bulging disc in his neck the entire season and was still a PPG player even though his goal totals were down. I think we’re only looking at the negatives a lot here which is fine because there certainly is a risk. But the major question is whose going to be the best option over the next 5 years Eichel from 25-30 or Mika 29-34 since they both will probably make the same coin. There are for sure risks, don’t let anyone tell you differently. However, Eichel on the rangers with LaF on his left, and Kravstov/ buch on his right with panarin playing with him on the PP might explode playing here. He may reach a new level we haven’t seen yet TBH. I’m not comparing him to signing Bazal or Aho guys we’ll have no chance at. My biggest concern frankly is that if they land Eichel Quinn stay Longer lolEichel was also on pace to score 8 goals this year in 82 games. He hasn't been able to bring his team close to the POs ever. I have big concerns for him just as I did with Brad Richards. I think he make the most sense for a solid strong team, that doesn't have top end ability. But I would be concerned about how he would do for a team like ours. Would he match-up well against the top lines around us?
I just don't think he is a good counter to guys like Barzal, Aho, even Crosby can be mentioned, Tampa's speed and so forth. If we were talking about like Barzal, I would be willing to go all in without any doubt. But Eichel just doesn't do it at all for me. JMHO.
I brought this up previously and was rebuffed by the covid warriors. If he stopped eating a lot of meat for example that would definitely add to his lack of energy. Plus the covid. It’s happened to a couple of my friends that made the switch and went back. They just don’t perform as well without animal fats and proteins. But this is just me speculating"Immediately after the Swede began to snap out of it, mention was made that Zibanejad had reported to camp after losing dramatic amount of weight over the offseason. Our best information now indicates that No. 93 indeed had radically changed his diet between leaving last summer’s bubble in Toronto and reporting to New York in January. That may have been a factor."
It's hard to know what to make of Mika Zibanejad's Rangers season
Yes, without any doubt I would also sign Barzal over Eichel. He has the driving quality that wins games. He's on a rival team, but I have to admit he's really efficient at what he does. He drives the play really well and was a godsend for the Islanders barn.
But, so has Zibanejad been. He is a hockey dictator on the ice when he's in his flow, it's as simple as that. Eichel doesn't just because he's a very skilled player. Eichel doesn't carry the line. That's what you want in a core player.
It's the mixture of qualities that matters. Eichel on the right team would be a star, say he would play in Pastrnak's role in Boston. He would probably outshine Pastrnak. Boston can afford that, NYR can't. That's also why I laughed when Buffalo signed Adam Hall, because it was such an outlandish mixture of the qualities the team actually needed. Their owners are terrible in the extent of their terrible GM signings. New York fans can at least be happy the team wasn't owned by owners like in Buffalo.
Even bigger OT: This cultural trait of being very loyal is very easy to attain when the world you live in is a frozen wasteland. You quickly learn you need the help of others to survive and grow. It's also why I culturally think the Nordic nations were so quick to revolt and become protestants in the 30 year war in the 1600s. They couldn't submit to one monoteistic truth even after centuries of that rule and were very eager to change that in a grand war.
Come one ola, Eichel for sure drives play. Guy had a bulging disc in his neck the entire season and was still a PPG player even though his goal totals were down. I think we’re only looking at the negatives a lot here which is fine because there certainly is a risk. But the major question is whose going to be the best option over the next 5 years Eichel from 25-30 or Mika 29-34 since they both will probably make the same coin. There are for sure risks, don’t let anyone tell you differently. However, Eichel on the rangers with LaF on his left, and Kravstov/ buch on his right with panarin playing with him on the PP might explode playing here. He may reach a new level we haven’t seen yet TBH. I’m not comparing him to signing Bazal or Aho guys we’ll have no chance at. My biggest concern frankly is that if they land Eichel Quinn stay Longer lol
I brought this up previously and was rebuffed by the covid warriors. If he stopped eating a lot of meat for example that would definitely add to his lack of energy. Plus the covid. It’s happened to a couple of my friends that made the switch and went back. They just don’t perform as well without animal fats and proteins. But this is just me speculating
Maybe I am overly down on him. Can’t help but to consider his play at the latest WCH where he displayed record levels of floating. Can be misleading because just because someone mailed it in their it doesn’t mean they would mail it in, in the NHL.
But the deciding factor for me isn’t about that really, because no matter what he isn’t going to beat guys like Aho, Barzal or the top lines around us when it comes to moving the puck N-S, skating up and down the ice. Hughes/Hirscher on the horizon in NJ. Tampa get that extreme speed in their entire top 9. Sid is still Sid.
And I mean, I do think that is a huge part of why Buffalo isn’t doing better. Eichel puts them on the board but he isn’t an — elite — driving factor.
Can we compile a list of guys who were Eichels level of elite who came back close to or at the level they were at before such an injury?
I can't think of any guy at that level with that specific injury? I think that'd be really interesting to think about/discuss.
Letang is the only "higher" level guy I can think of. He came back fine but like Eichel, he's missed a ton of time with various shit.
I can't remember the last time the Rangers had a 1C as dynamic as Zib, no way I let him go, he's too important to this team. I'm good with him, Strome and Chytil down the middle. If Strome goes, that's ok but he gets undersold on this board. Let whiney, pastey-ass Eichel go pound sand at the beach in LA.
He's in a tier above Nylander, Gomez, Richards, Stepan, Brass, Nedved, NYR Lindros for sure. Think you have to go back to late career Gretzky and Messier to find someone better.
I disagree vehemently with Machinehead about him being a '3rd liner'
There are questions about consistency and durability, but I'd rather keep Mika and the farm (Which will be super important to have to cycle in ELCs) than trade the house for Eichel.
He's in a tier above Nylander, Gomez, Richards, Stepan, Brass, Nedved, NYR Lindros for sure. Think you have to go back to late career Gretzky and Messier to find someone better.
I disagree vehemently with Machinehead about him being a '3rd liner'
There are questions about consistency and durability, but I'd rather keep Mika and the farm (Which will be super important to have to cycle in ELCs) than trade the house for Eichel.
He's in a tier above Nylander, Gomez, Richards, Stepan, Brass, Nedved, NYR Lindros for sure. Think you have to go back to late career Gretzky and Messier to find someone better.
I disagree vehemently with Machinehead about him being a '3rd liner'
There are questions about consistency and durability, but I'd rather keep Mika and the farm (Which will be super important to have to cycle in ELCs) than trade the house for Eichel.
That he is the best center the Rangers have had since Gretzky skated his last shift, is unarguable. The last 3 years, the overall play has been at that elite 1C that this team has been searching for since Gretzky retired.He's in a tier above Nylander, Gomez, Richards, Stepan, Brass, Nedved, NYR Lindros for sure. Think you have to go back to late career Gretzky and Messier to find someone better.
I disagree vehemently with Machinehead about him being a '3rd liner'
There are questions about consistency and durability, but I'd rather keep Mika and the farm (Which will be super important to have to cycle in ELCs) than trade the house for Eichel.
Gorton and JD could well play a term for cash game with him.As long as he's not asking for anything ridiculous, I'd do all I can to lock him up. Eichel would cost too much and totally change the team's chemistry.
Gorton and JD could well play a term for cash game with him.
That may well be. I would think that coming into next year, Gorton would want to keep any drama to a minimum. Plus that is a certain game of chicken. Could cost you a lot more.I wonder if they'll start negotiations this offseason if they think he's their guy. But I get the feeling Gorton has no problem going up to the deadline to get a deal done.
He's in a tier above Nylander, Gomez, Richards, Stepan, Brass, Nedved, NYR Lindros for sure. Think you have to go back to late career Gretzky and Messier to find someone better.
I disagree vehemently with Machinehead about him being a '3rd liner'
There are questions about consistency and durability, but I'd rather keep Mika and the farm (Which will be super important to have to cycle in ELCs) than trade the house for Eichel.