so i questioned chatgpt 4.o on some parameters of NHL success based on two-way play and size, etc and here is what the algorithm concluded...just for fun:
- Ivan Demidov:
- Size: Demidov is generally considered to have a more typical NHL build, which might give him a physical advantage.
- Style of Play: His game is more well-rounded, with a combination of skill, physicality, and adaptability that suits the modern NHL, where size and strength still play significant roles.
- Matvei Michkov:
- Size: Michkov is smaller and relies heavily on his exceptional skill, vision, and hockey IQ. While smaller players can succeed, as discussed, they often face greater challenges and must consistently outperform to reach and sustain high levels in the NHL.
- Style of Play: Michkov is an elite talent, known for his offensive creativity and scoring ability, which can sometimes outweigh size disadvantages. However, his smaller stature might require adjustments to the physical demands of the NHL.
Conclusion
- Demidov: Based on the correlation analysis and his physical attributes, Demidov may have a higher probability of NHL success, particularly because his size aligns more with the attributes historically valued in the league. His game is likely to translate well to the NHL's physical style, giving him a higher floor in terms of potential.
- Michkov: While Michkov is an exceptional talent, his smaller size suggests he might face more obstacles in adapting to the NHL. However, if he can leverage his skills effectively, he could still achieve great success, albeit with a potentially narrower margin for error.
In summary,
Demidov likely has the most chance of success due to his combination of size and skill, which aligns with what the NHL typically rewards in terms of salary and impact. Michkov, though incredibly talented, may have to overcome more challenges related to his
so i questioned chatgpt 4.o on some parameters of NHL success based on two-way play and size, etc and here is what the algorithm concluded...just for fun:
- Ivan Demidov:
- Size: Demidov is generally considered to have a more typical NHL build, which might give him a physical advantage.
- Style of Play: His game is more well-rounded, with a combination of skill, physicality, and adaptability that suits the modern NHL, where size and strength still play significant roles.
- Matvei Michkov:
- Size: Michkov is smaller and relies heavily on his exceptional skill, vision, and hockey IQ. While smaller players can succeed, as discussed, they often face greater challenges and must consistently outperform to reach and sustain high levels in the NHL.
- Style of Play: Michkov is an elite talent, known for his offensive creativity and scoring ability, which can sometimes outweigh size disadvantages. However, his smaller stature might require adjustments to the physical demands of the NHL.
Conclusion
- Demidov: Based on the correlation analysis and his physical attributes, Demidov may have a higher probability of NHL success, particularly because his size aligns more with the attributes historically valued in the league. His game is likely to translate well to the NHL's physical style, giving him a higher floor in terms of potential.
- Michkov: While Michkov is an exceptional talent, his smaller size suggests he might face more obstacles in adapting to the NHL. However, if he can leverage his skills effectively, he could still achieve great success, albeit with a potentially narrower margin for error.
In summary,
Demidov likely has the most chance of success due to his combination of size and skill, which aligns with what the NHL typically rewards in terms of salary and impact. Michkov, though incredibly talented, may have to overcome more challenges related to his size.
Exactly what I have been saying they both have same skill levels but Demidov has the NHL size, as a Habs fan I totally know how much harder it is for an undersized forward to create offense………
