This is my kind of post! And, for the record, I agree with this 100%. Once, a long time ago, Ray Whitney and even Justin Williams were "the scapegoats". I remember it well. Doug Weight. Erik Cole. All had their turns. You are right bleedgreen, and you were here back then too. You remember it as well as I do.
Williams was never a scapegoat, that's revisionist history at its finest. Williams was a business/sports calculation that was incorrect.
Where Williams and Ferland have similarities is the question of whether a budget team can afford to use a sizable amount of its budget on a player who is regularly unable to contribute. That's not a knock on a player as being "soft" or "unwilling to play through injury." I believe Ferland is trying like hell to get out there and can't go, or gets out there and aggravates the injury and then can't go any more.
Williams had a series of freak major injuries (ACL tear in Philly, ACL tear in Carolina, torn Achilles in off-season workout, back injury, broken hand from a shot) that made it hard for the Canes to have $3.5M/yr committed to him in 2008-09 dollars. Williams turned around his injury luck in LA but it was hard to believe that was a guarantee based on:
07-08: 37 games played
08-09: 44 games played (32 Carolina, 12 LAK)
09-10: 49 games played + 4 playoff games in LA
Since then Williams has turned it around, playing over 70 games in 8 of 9 seasons between 10-11 and now.
Do I think Ferland is a similar to Williams in that if he can stay healthy he'll be a major piece in someone's Stanley Cup run? Yes. But the difference I see between Williams and Ferland was that Williams had a lot of freak injuries early in his career that were unrelated to each other and also not related to his playing style. Ferland gets injured in part because of his aggressive physical style of play. That makes it harder for me to believe he'll be able to avoid these types of injuries in the future.