Yawn, get back to me when you actually type coherent thoughts and not 4 paragraphs of complete world salad to fill a word count to make you look like you know anything you're talking about. I posted the incident because a beyond harmless looking play he once again exaggerated to the gills which would indicate that the diving moniker he got fits. The Canes fan didn't even reply to the following post where he got asked if Necas missed time from it which is ironic because he probably missed 0 time from it but we're wrapped about semantics about knee v ankle.
Martin Necas Injuries - NHL | FOX Sports
Gee, shocking, nothing lower body around the time period that play happened.
Your claim is that because Necas has a reputation as a diver, he’s inevitably faking (regardless of any video evidence showing severity of impact) whenever he stays down after contact but doesn’t exit the game. This happens in plenty of circumstances throughout the season to many different players all around the league. You don’t suddenly gain definitive knowledge of a player’s intentions or pain level on all contact plays because of a negative reputation.
As an example from own team, Charlie McAvoy gets banged up seemingly every other game and gets attended to on the ice and usually returns quickly. It happens on both questionable plays as well as clearly legal contact. Is he a wimp with a low pain tolerance? I don’t know, maybe. But he’s clearly not just faking injury all the time, especially as it’s usually happening on plays that have no probability of being penalties.
Going back to the original play here, I’m not sure what you’re looking for. Regardless of Meier’s intent (none, IMO), and the penalty call (should have been 2 mins IMO), you can’t look at that sort of contact as a reasonable person and simply claim that Necas showing injury immediately after was “faking” because of prior reputation and the fact that he didn’t end up heading to the locker room. His knee got cranked in a very awkward direction. That’s going to hurt for some length of time. He got lucky and while he was already up on his feet, the refs (for whatever their reason, after watching multiple replays repeatedly) deemed it a major. He wasn’t just laying on the ice as the refs carried out their review. Clearly they could see that he wasn’t gravely injured.
I get the frustration with the penalty. But you’re overreaching by a comical margin to watch that video and then claim that, because Necas stayed down for a length of time and has a reputation, there’s no way he could have been legitimately hurt at the time.