What would st. Louis be offering? They have a ton of draft capital, but beyond that?
Snuggerud, PV wants him just to get the Gaucher whiners to stfu.
What would st. Louis be offering? They have a ton of draft capital, but beyond that?
Looking through puckpedia, it's baffling. No idea what the blues would be moving that makes any sense.What would st. Louis be offering? They have a ton of draft capital, but beyond that?
Hey, I really liked those 3 utterly pointless games that Gaucher played this past year! Who needs a top line winger when we've got Gaucher to keep us entertained?Snuggerud, PV wants him just to get the Gaucher whiners to stfu.
Let’s make the speculation more fun. How about a 3 way trade? NYR and Carolina from left field.Probably Philly. Hell PV, Drury, and Danny are probably all on a 3way call together.
But then we are stuck with Krapaniemi. 9 points in 42 games.Let’s make the speculation more fun. How about a 3 way trade? NYR and Carolina from left field.
Rangers get Mctavish
Canes get Schneider, Sykora/Laba
Ducks get 1st (26), Kotkaniemi, Nikishin
Rangers get their young center for spare parts. They don’t want to extend Schneider anyway.
Canes are analytical and they probably find another underrate prospect and Sykora/Laba look like their types. They get dump a bad contract, and Schneider probably ends up having his best years like Skeji did after coming from the Rangers.
Ducks get another LD (haha), but hey maybe he can play RD a bit like Lacombe, Zellweger, Moore. Kotkaniemi’s contract is what we probably need to pay to get anyone to sign in anaheim anyhow. Beeker gets his coveted 1st round pick.
For San Diego's 4th line.Don't need to trade for Kotkaniemi. I bet he'll be bought out and you can just sign him for cheap.
Is the beeker a magician or what!So we got a three team bidding war for McTavish? Sens, Bues, and Rangers.
Signing cheap for us is like 4x4 or 5x5Don't need to trade for Kotkaniemi. I bet he'll be bought out and you can just sign him for cheap.
Ooooo baby!Either way, we should probably crack open that draft guide again. Seems like we will be picking tomorrow.
Hey, has had 30/40 point seasons. He can play center, wing, is physical. I don’t think we could attract a 25 year old on his current term. Plus it’s the price we pay for that 1st, the one we will whiff on haha.But then we are stuck with Krapaniemi. 9 points in 42 games.
Got damnit… we are a development organization that feeds other teams hahaEither way, we should probably crack open that draft guide again. Seems like we will be picking tomorrow.
Would not love that at all.Am i the only 1 who would be upset with a futures based deal. Value aside?
Unless it is a top 5 pick or top prospect it makes zero sense. And I’m all about futures.Am i the only 1 who would be upset with a futures based deal. Value aside?
Only if there isn't a deal in place to trade said futures to another team as part of a package for a impact player like Larkin.Am i the only 1 who would be upset with a futures based deal. Value aside?
Trading mac virtually locks us out of larkin.Only if there isn't a deal in place to trade said futures to another team as part of a package for a impact player like Larkin.
I know zero prospects for the first time in like 20 years. LolOoooo baby!
Miller is significantly more talented. Schneider doesn’t have anywhere close the tools, skating, offense that Miller brings. Schneider also isn’t as physical or nasty as a pure shut down guy and has poor metrics. He’s not the centerpiece I’d want for Mctavish.Well at least if it’s Schneider the rangers have a recent history of giving away good dmen a la miller