ConnorMcMullet
#12 Colby Cave
- Jun 10, 2017
- 10,366
- 18,257
It's Braeden, my mistake. I must have had Guhle on my mind.To me, Drydale is Byram. Simple as that.
If there is doubt that Rossi or Perfetti will not be able to play C in the NHL, then the Swedes will move up, and Lundell will move up just like Kotkaniemi did, because he appears to be able to play C at higher levels, and some teams are desperate for C's.
Is it Brendan, or Braedan Schneider?
Pretty much my reasoning. You can't have a guy with his upside outside of the top-20.It's the skillsets. Poirier is perceived as having extremely high potential. You can disagree with that if you want, but it's seen by those who rate him highly that if he figures it out, he'll be a star. I don't think anyone believes Villeneuve has that type of upside.
The points might be what you said, but look at the goal differential. Poirier is an excellent goal-scorer for a defenseman. That's the type of thing that is more translatable to higher levels than putting up assist numbers in junior hockey without having elite playmaking skills, which I haven't seen anyone suggest Villeneuve has.
What are your thoughts on the list?