1989
Registered User
- Aug 3, 2010
- 10,421
- 4,854
Greatness implies winning.He is also now on a streak of 9 consecutive seasons with a minimum of 97 points, which should be no surprise that Gretzky is the only other to do that.
Highest minimum points for 9 consecutive seasons:
Gretzky - 149
McDavid - 97
Bossy - 91
Dione - 84
Esposito - 83
McDavid is the only modern name there. Since the salary cap era:
McDavid - 97
Draisaitl - 70
Kucherov - 65
Ovechkin -56
Kane - 55
MacKinnon - 53
Crosby - 47
Malkin - 33
(Key players only, not an exhaustive list)
In fact, the only other 2 players to even get 97 points a season 9 times were Wayne Gretzky & Mario Lemieux. Just some legendary longevity to go along with McDavids' already legendary peak. It is important to recognize that none of this matters though... he will be remembered the same as Joe Thornton if he doesn't win a team trophy that Patrick Maroon won 3 timesThere will be a magical forcefeild that prevents people from considering him an "all-time great", that's what I am told at least
![]()
Winning individual categorical trophies or accolades isn't enough when the conversation is about being the greatest.
If you disagree that's fine - but ask McDavid if he'd rather have the stats you're rattling off as proof of greatness, or a Stanley Cup. Ask him about the Conn Smythe he didn't accept. Ask him what he dreams about, or has nightmares about.
In Bossy or Ovechkin, we can acknowledge them as the best goalscorers ever, generally speaking. But no serious hockey fan considers them in the GOAT conversation. Thornton, as you pointed out, has never won the Cup. If he won the Cup 3 times in his career, he might have been considered a GOAT candidate. Who was Yzerman before his Cups? LeBron before Miami? And the list goes on.
The mistake people make when trying to hand-wave McDavid's lack of team championships is that unlike someone like Maroon, we know McDavid is capable of great things on an individual level on a game-by-game basis. The scoring titles and individual trophies are the guarantee, where most players never sniff a single vote or are ever in the race.
Yet the trophy that requires no vote is the one that eludes great players and commonly rests in the hands of role players and journeymen because well, numbers and chance play a role.
I have nothing against seeing McDavid win a Cup or three. In this short life, I'd like to witness all the greatness sports can offer, not just the pitfalls and what-ifs of potential career trajectories. I think McDavid is finally rounding out to what he has to do to win a Cup while captaining a team.
But it remains to be witnessed. Hockey will be better for it if he can take the crown.