Maurice leads panthers to third straight Final | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Maurice leads panthers to third straight Final

I think his success in Florida vindicates those who pushed back against those who said Maurice was not a good coach. He's clearly a really good coach . But you can be a good coach and stil lose the room or out stay your welcome.
Every single coach has lost the room and/or gotten fired at some point... even the very best

It's a position with a shelf life. It used to be that you only got canned if you weren't getting results... now you can get axed when you piss off thr wrong players. Look at De Boer
 
yeah, for maurice to be vindicated the jets would need to be far worse then they have been, he got to coach a stacked team and we got better results away from him, it was clearly time for a change well before but this poster has been pushing this narrative since the day maurice left, god reading that 1st post is painful trying to use the advanced stats with lowry as vindication rofl...

Funny to see this board's resident thought police talk about others "pushing a narrative" :sarcasm: . I talk about Maurice maybe 3 times a year...some "pushing narrative".
 
Why does it have to be an either or situation. He was here for roughly 9 years and lost the room by the end of it. You can be Scotty Bowman and will need to be replaced if you lose the room.

The Jets got instantly better once he left and have had three excellent years. The guys in our room needed a change.

He also needed a change and had great success in Florida. I'm happy for him, but his time here was over and we wouldn't have turned things around to the extent we did had he stuck around.

My point is that the narrative around this board when he left was about him being the source of all evil. I think people have forgotten how much he was taking the blame for a terrible roster some of those years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNP
It vindicates those who disagreed with all of these takes:

" Maurice was never the right coach, look at his all time loss record" He's a mediocre coach at best"

I think we know by now that's not the case. He's a great communicater and has proven that he's definitely well above average.

"Ok hes a good coach with a ceiling, but Maurice is the reason Jets won't be able to win a Stanley Cup" We need a better coach to take us there:

Not quite . How long a shelf life a coach has is also up to the players. There's alot of dynamics at play . Maybe the Jets needed "another /new" coach but not a coach who is "better "


It's doesn't invalidate: "Maurice was a good coach for us an can be for another team . But It's time for a change and he needs to go "

If the Jets was given a different group of players I would hire Maurice in an instant . But it was clear, the fit was no longer there.

In a vacuum , Maurice is a great coach with people I.Q that's off the charts .

Alot of angry Jets fans type with their emotions . It's easy to say, "Maurice is horrible , get him out of here". They resist using logic . It's easier to say if something is not working , it's means it's/He's terrible .- it's not quite that simple .

There was a drowned out minority here who measured their response saying not that Maurice is a "bad" coach just that his time was up here. Buts its the "Maurice sucks!" comments that most people notice/bandwagon to and the news media tends to be an echo chamber for that emotional, vocal group .

Equally a bad take would be " Paul Maurice is a great coach. Even if the Jets are losing and the players have tuned him out/fans have been vocal etc, ...we should still keep him no matter what because he's a great coach"

So no it doesn't vindicate those who said we shouldn't have let Maurice go - we should of . Just vindicates those who pushed back against the "he's a bad coach/a team can't win the Cup with him. " crowd . And For reasons I just stated and for the reason many forgot.

And....we actually didn't let him go. He left himself because he knew it was time.

If your unhappy Maurice is not still here, ironically you should be blaming Maurice himself for leaving not True North . You could blame the players for tuning him out , but I chose not too because players tuning coaches out is a professional sports phenomenon. It just happens after time.
 
Last edited:
I think if our team was architected a lot better maybe more final appearances say if we had McDavid because in 2014-15 he made us better than we should've with Pavelec in net, but the teams we lost to in the playoffs when he coached us won the cup or went to the finals, minus Calgary but that was play-ins and Scheifele got hurt.

I didn't like him coaching for us, but he did a damn good job with us. No wonder he chose to resign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roccerfeller
I always liked Maurice , he's a good coach, very smart man but one of the best things Bowness did was make Lowry captain. I think just that one move changed the room big time and i don't think Maurice would have been able to strip Wheeler of the C , they were too close.
 
I think if our team was architected a lot better maybe more final appearances say if we had McDavid because in 2014-15 he made us better than we should've with Pavelec in net, but the teams we lost to in the playoffs when he coached us won the cup or went to the finals, minus Calgary but that was play-ins and Scheifele got hurt.

I didn't like him coaching for us, but he did a damn good job with us. No wonder he chose to resign.
I'm not really understanding what you are saying here. Of course we would be better with McDavid , every team would, but we never passed on him in the draft or anything. We did so well with our drafting we were never shity enough to get a 1st overall pick like Edmonton did , 4 out of 5 years in a row .
 
If you could talk to Maurice off the record about what the biggest difference between coaching the Jets and coaching the Panthers is.
One of his answers would be officiating ... the small market teams in Canada always get the short end of the stick when it comes down to the calls.
With TV viewership of the Stanley Cup down in the US once again does the NHL want small market Canadian teams in the final?
 
I'm not really understanding what you are saying here. Of course we would be better with McDavid , every team would, but we never passed on him in the draft or anything. We did so well with our drafting we were never shity enough to get a 1st overall pick like Edmonton did , 4 out of 5 years in a row .
Because lots of teams were deliberately tanking for McDavid. Well, Edmonton flat out just sucked.

But Buffalo I don't need to explain.
Arizona was trying to bring a franchise player so they never relocate.
Toronto wanted to make both theirs and McDavid's dream of playing in Toronto come true.

I thought we'd suck that season and get him. Had Claude Noel coached us that year we probably had fallen in the top-five. I mean who cares now because we got Kyle Connor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sipowicz
Paul Maurice should be thankful that Sylvain Lefebvre was fired after being hired by the Blue Jackets because of his refusal to get vaccinated during the COVID season and was available when the Panthers realized they need a complete turnover from Quenneville/Brunette. Much, much better coach for defencemen than Huddy ever was.
 
Paul Maurice should be thankful that Sylvain Lefebvre was fired after being hired by the Blue Jackets because of his refusal to get vaccinated during the COVID season and was available when the Panthers realized they need a complete turnover from Quenneville/Brunette. Much, much better coach for defencemen than Huddy ever was.
That was a huge stroke of luck
 
  • Like
Reactions: sipowicz

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad