seanlinden
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2009
- 25,410
- 1,822
Objectively... he can't really ask for more than Guenther, Jarvis or Lafreniere got on 8 (7) year deals.... when 5 of those years will still be "RFA" years.
Based on that, and knowing that he's probably going to take Matthews' advice in not doing an 8 year deal, I see 2 reasonable approaches here.
One is to do a 6 year deal at something like $6.5m. Gives the Leafs a solid window to win... only buys 1 ufa year, and gives knies some reasonable job security. He'd be paid a little less than some of those marquee stars who are viewed as more primary catalysts.
Alternative 2 would be a 4 year deal... maybe in the neighborhood of $5 to $5.5m. It's more than a typical bridge, but also more years, while still maintaining RFA status.
Based on that, and knowing that he's probably going to take Matthews' advice in not doing an 8 year deal, I see 2 reasonable approaches here.
One is to do a 6 year deal at something like $6.5m. Gives the Leafs a solid window to win... only buys 1 ufa year, and gives knies some reasonable job security. He'd be paid a little less than some of those marquee stars who are viewed as more primary catalysts.
Alternative 2 would be a 4 year deal... maybe in the neighborhood of $5 to $5.5m. It's more than a typical bridge, but also more years, while still maintaining RFA status.