- Jun 2, 2007
- 14,640
- 9,202
I am honestly at the point where I would let him walk and if we miss the playoffs because of it, who cares, at least they tried something different.I want Marner gone, but to play devil's advocate: we replace him with a 60-point player like Ehlers and miss the playoffs. Mitch wins us A LOT of games in November and March....
But not May and JuneI want Marner gone, but to play devil's advocate: we replace him with a 60-point player like Ehlers and miss the playoffs. Mitch wins us A LOT of games in November and March....
If we were a small market team where play-off revenue was tantamount then you would be happy with the status quo. In Toronto the goal is always to win the Stanley Cup and while this team is very good it is not a cup winning team. We have limited options for improving the team and the biggest one is the freed up cap space. Marner doesn't really play like a Berube system player so is the most logical subtraction. Who gives an RFA a NMC clause in the last year of their contract that walks them to UFA status?I want to let him walk but I think the business case is to do the same thing over again... keeping Leafs in the top 3 in the Atlantic with Marner as insurance in case Matthews is cooked as a front line player. So I voted keep.
i mean hes not gonna sign for under 14 i dont think so you really can't keep himi
If we were a small market team where play-off revenue was tantamount then you would be happy with the status quo. In Toronto the goal is always to win the Stanley Cup and while this team is very good it is not a cup winning team. We have limited options for improving the team and the biggest one is the freed up cap space. Marner doesn't really play like a Berube system player so is the most logical subtraction. Who gives an RFA a NMC clause in the last year of their contract that walks them to UFA status?
well yea if you can get him for 8.5-9m its a no brainer you take him back lol but his dad and agent run the show no way they let him leave money on tablei would sign for 8.7 mil which is what he is worth
According to Chris Johnston he thinks the opposite. A first round exit doesnt make small market teams much more successful and doesn't attract fans to the stadium. Stanley Cup runs do... he thinks Leafs on the other hand generate alot more by being just a playoff team because fans come no matter what, so they are satisfied with it and make less drastic moves than small market teams.If we were a small market team where play-off revenue was tantamount then you would be happy with the status quo. In Toronto the goal is always to win the Stanley Cup and while this team is very good it is not a cup winning team. We have limited options for improving the team and the biggest one is the freed up cap space. Marner doesn't really play like a Berube system player so is the most logical subtraction. Who gives an RFA a NMC clause in the last year of their contract that walks them to UFA status?