Advanced stats
Registered User
- May 26, 2010
- 11,689
- 7,621
ekblad in a heartbeatI saw people saying the only person you trade Marner for is a Seth Jones type defenceman. Who would this be? Only guy I can think of is Ekblad but why would Florida do that?
Oh dreger...
I saw people saying the only person you trade Marner for is a Seth Jones type defenceman. Who would this be? Only guy I can think of is Ekblad but why would Florida do that?
I can't see the team viewing Kapanen as more being worth more than Hyman.
He hasn't been that bad. He really has nobody else to play with. Yandle is bad in his own end now and the rest of their D-men are hot garbage.Ekblad is absolutely wretched. He's a disaster and most Panther fans agree.
It implies to me at least that marner and Ferris aren't waiting around for an offersheet?
There's literally nothing in that tweet.
Kyle flew to freaken Switzerland to meet with Willy and his reps and the deal still took months and an overpay.
It implies to me at least that marner and Ferris aren't waiting around for an offersheet
Maybe Hyman is on a lousy contract! And Kapanen should be compared to players around the league.
The whole point is not to make excuses. If you have to rely on your players taking less than what they're worth, then you've already failed step-one as GM. Now it is a tough position for Dubas since Lou the organization with Marleau and Zaitsev's huge contracts, but it is 100% doable.
Look below at an extreme example of me moving off Marleau, Zaitsev, Horton, Brown's contracts (along with assets so teams take them). You have 8.2M left in cap-space, while signing Marner to a Tavares-size contract.
View attachment 232301
The legitimacy of online commentators isn't what we're discussing. Nice attempt at distraction though..
All that's being asked is for some sort of evidence to support the claim that Marner is making McDavid/Crosby endorsement money, as the Athletic reported.
Instead of providing that, you want skeptics to provide evidence that the Athletics's writer is lying?!
Are you actually serious?
& IF Marleau, Zaitsev and Horton (all highly unlikely) are not moved then what is the Marner contract impact on the Leafs roster..
PS. Not sure you're getting Kapanen resigned at $2 mil.
The published report by a credible media outlet with no history of false claims is the evidence. I have no reason to believe they are lying or making things up.
If you don't want to believe the report for whatever reason, that's on you.
& IF Marleau, Zaitsev and Horton (all highly unlikely) are not moved then what is the Marner contract impact on the Leafs roster..
PS. Not sure you're getting Kapanen resigned at $2 mil.
agree on the odds of it happening being low, but disagree on the offer sheet - if he signs one you have to try to have that be with a team whose picks are going to be high, and the higher the money the better so I would also signal that you're willing to match up to $11M so someone hamstrings themselves if they do go through with it. I think if he signs one, it's likely that Dubas lets him go unless it's a really reasonable number.You can't let him sign an offersheet, having somebody else dictate your very tough cap situation is a bad idea, especially if your plan is to match but I'm more interested in putting a team together for next season at this point and Marner sitting or getting an offersheet look like bad news to me
I do think the offersheet stuff is overstated, good teams don't have the cap room and if you suck giving up 4 lottery picks so you can give Marner 11M+ doesn't seem particularly smart, I think Kapanen and Johnsson are better offersheet candidates personally
ya I could see that as well, I meant more like if you're trading Marner 1 for 1 it wouldn't be for someone who could become a Seth Jones, you'd want the Seth Jones because Marner is already a premier talent - like you wouldn't do it for Makar 1 for 1 kind of thingI'd do it for a merely useful defenseman, a prospect with a chance of becoming Marner (but is more likely to be a good top-six contributor), and some picks.
For example, if Minnesota's the parter, something around Dumba (plus) is the obvious Jones-Johansson style trade. But I'd also think there'd be a way to do something like Pateryn (or Spurgeon?), Kaprizov (or, since they're so keen to move him, Zucker?), MIN's 2019 1st (12th), and a second.
How can they control that?agree on the odds of it happening being low, but disagree on the offer sheet - if he signs one you have to try to have that be with a team whose picks are going to be high, and the higher the money the better so I would also signal that you're willing to match up to $11M so someone hamstrings themselves if they do go through with it. I think if he signs one, it's likely that Dubas lets him go unless it's a really reasonable number.
That's not evidence. It's speculation. If they had evidence of Marner's endorsement earnings, they would have published the findings and cited how they found them.
You know, actual journalism...
Instead they're basically resorting to Eklund-level speculation for gullible folks such as yourself.
talk about retaliatory offer sheets when the media asks, at the GM meetings, etc. I think it's something you could also call each GM directly and tell them "you do it to mine, I'll do it to yours"How can they control that?
Any player that signs an offer sheet has one foot out the door anyway. I don't believe this will be the case for Marner but if so, it's probably best to cut ties.
Maybe Hyman is on a lousy contract! And Kapanen should be compared to players around the league.
I'm pretty sure anyone can build a lineup adding 7 ELC's to the team, Marleau and Zaitsev included.
How can they control that?
Any player that signs an offer sheet has one foot out the door anyway. I don't believe this will be the case for Marner but if so, it's probably best to cut ties.
Journals used unnamed sources all the time.
Eklund has a history of crap. The Athletic doesn't. I don't think they could stake their reputation on making a false claim that could easily be refuted if false.
I trust them due to their history and reputation, you don't, fine.
You trust unsourced, unsubstantiated statements and I don't.
Got it.