If Marner could get some more PP time - I'd put him in that 5-10 range of league scoring.
It's kind of hard doing a direct comparison with Kane. After Chicago's 1st cup, they assigned Kane the role of driving the 2nd line with very sub-par players for the most part. He wasn't playing with no John Tavares. Many years later when he got a talented guy he could finally click with (Panarin) he lit the league on fire (his 106 point season is one of the best seasons post lockout when adjusted for league scoring).
Whether or not Marner can replicate his 94 point season I'm 50/50 on. I hope he can.
Hey...I'm not trying to put you in a spot. I am genuinely curious. Everyone gets caught up on Marner not being worth this or that.
That's fine but I asked someone else what would be an acceptable performance if he got 10.5MM x 6 and the response was that he needed 120 points or something like that which is quite ridiculous.
There hasn't been a clear discussion here of what the expectations next year would be at the various price points.
Kane is great even though he suffered some injuries. He was a point a game his first RFA year. Even if he played the full season, he wouldn't have finished more than 9th in point leaders and this is with a team that won the cup the year before.
Within a margin of error and all the intangibles that go with points, I would say that 5-10 is pretty well just as good in my mind.
If he cracks top 5, it might even be considered to be enough proof that he is better, no?