kennglin13
Registered User
- Oct 4, 2008
- 270
- 1
Anybody else think Gaborik changing wings is a bigger deal than we are letting on, which means this should be on the coach?
Last edited:
Anybody else think Gaborik changing wings is a bigger deal than we are letting on, which means this should be on the coach?
I thought that at first, but then I was told repeatedly that it was just another excuse for his poor play. Changing wings is pretty easy, which is why most wingers play both sides comfortably. The whole "left wing / right wing" thing is a myth.![]()
Staal, McDonagh and Girardi were amazing last year.
seriously... thats a bs excuse!! hes an elite player should be able to play any position needed.. he loooked better last night, but idk somethings up with him..as much as i want to have him here i want a change up.. we should trade and get multiple players
Really? I didnt see it. Thought he was atrocious again. At least compared to the standard he's built for himself.
He literally kills the offense for his line on numerous occasions each game.
He really does. He floats around and is late on every forecheck. Gets knocked off the puck. When he does get chances (PENALTY SHOT) he flubs them. Weak on the puck, weak on his skates.
To be honest, the whole scared of getting hit thing is getting really old, really fast. Sit out if you cant play right, because bad habits are forming in his game that im not sure can be turned off like a light if this team is fortunate enough to make the playoffs.
Its flat out embarrassing.
He literally kills the offense for his line on numerous occasions each game.
Bingo.
This, in a nutshell, is why the "but hes a 40 goal scorer when hes right" argument holds no weight with me. Hes not right. Hes not right in any aspect of the game. Hes been a detriment.
Same goes for Richards too, but a lesser degree.
Seriously can we scratch this guy already?
For who?
I fully expect this from glass gaborik.
He never ever has back to back good seasons.
Just look at his stats.
Looking at his stats does quite the opposite actually.
09 bad
10 great
11 bad
12 great
13 bad
and it continues in Minnesota.
Trade him for a defensman or somebody not made of glass who consistanly not just once shows up in big games.
You don't see the logical flaw in trading him during a bad season when, by your qualifications, he should have another great one next year?
Not a lot of big investors here. You don't sell a 5 dollar stock if you know it'll be ten dollars tomorrow.