f7ben
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2018
- 2,908
- 1,264
Nah , it only happens to him and when he played great he was still marginalized.He played like shit and got demoted. It happens.
Let me know when anyone else in the team is treated like he was.
Nah , it only happens to him and when he played great he was still marginalized.He played like shit and got demoted. It happens.
Sorry, I misread your intent.I am not talking about the user or his opinion of players. I am talking about contracts being offered to young players at market value or even above based on probable future projections.
Nyquist played 7 minutes in game 6 after his terrible game 5.Nah , it only happens to him and when he played great he was still marginalized.
Let me know when anyone else in the team is treated like he was.
Rereading it it wasn’t really clear. No worries!Sorry, I misread your intent.
No, they probably just want the first 60 games to count as well.Rossi’s camp is putting everything on 5-6 games.
Let me know when you are ready to move past your „one liner hot takes“ and have a serious, fact based discussion about Rossi!It’s from his agent, but keep talking.
I have missed lots of games.. why are we trading Rossi? Billy wants a C version of Foligno instead?
Not sure about demoted, but he was in a down stretch when the contract happened. 5 points in 11 games, only 3 goals in the last 17 games.Didn't Boldy play like shit and then got demoted and somehow still managed to get the contract?
We're not this. Much more middle of the pack.
Sure, point is we need some scoring on the wing and also from the blue line.
I would disagreeI suspect that Guerin's issue with a 7 x $7M deal has more to do with the money than the years.
Yep.I just think a 7x7 deal in this economy is going to be so valuable. It’s not like we’re going to have an easy solution at center to replace him. Sign him to 7x7, play him top 6 again, and a year from now people will be killing themselves to trade for that deal when Bennett is making 9.
You think he'd rather pay Rossi 5 x $7M vs. 7 x $5M?I would disagree
I just think a 7x7 deal in this economy is going to be so valuable. It’s not like we’re going to have an easy solution at center to replace him. Sign him to 7x7, play him top 6 again, and a year from now people will be killing themselves to trade for that deal when Bennett is making 9.
Yeah it’s basically another Ek type of deal which is universally considered a steal. Again, if he’s got a way to replace Rossi that I don’t know about- I’m all ears.It's also a very tradeable contract in a couple years if they still decide he isn't a fit. When the cap is 110M it'd be like a player making 5.5M this season or something close.
You think those are the offers...lolYou think he'd rather pay Rossi 5 x $7M vs. 7 x $5M?
I sure don't.
No... please go back and find the post you responded to, and re-read.You think those are the offers...lol
No no noYeah it’s basically another Ek type of deal which is universally considered a steal. Again, if he’s got a way to replace Rossi that I don’t know about- I’m all ears.
Can you reshareNo... please go back and find the post you responded to, and re-read.
Well, Rossi is certainly a more talented offensive player and his deal would likely project to be a lower percentage of the cap long term.No no no
Ek contract is the ultimate steal A Rossi contract of 7 v 7 will not be
Contracts consist of 2 main parts: the years and the per year $'s.Can you reshare
Yeah it’s basically another Ek type of deal which is universally considered a steal. Again, if he’s got a way to replace Rossi that I don’t know about- I’m all ears.