The guy is Reportedly asking for 6 years at 7 mill a piece, if you were the GM you mean to tell me you would jump on that deal for the sake of "signing Radulov"?
Come on now, this isn't about defending Bergevin for anything, that is simply a bad deal, and if Bergevin or anyone in his shoes signed it, its a bad deal. Him not signing a bad deal up to this point with Radulov is better than signing Radulov to that contract, Period.
People need to stop looking for ridiculous little excuses like this to bash management, "hE dIdN't sIgN RaDuLoV tO A rIdIcUlOuS cOnTrAcT YeT!". Ok thats great, hopefully he signs Radulov to a good contract, other wise not keeping him because some other crazy GM way worse than ours, did, is the right call. You mean to tell me its Bergevin's fault if he offers Radulov 7 mill for 4 years and Radulov decides thats not good and goes to Vegas for 6 years? Its a contract negotiation, their are 2 sides involved, we can't just blindly be like, "oh man Bergevin sucks he didn't keep Radulov" if he offers a fair deal but Radulov jumps on the crazy deal somewhere else. Just like Kovalev, Gainey had the fair 2 year offer on the table, it was Kovalev who got greedy and looked else where for the crazy deal, by the time he came back to the table Gainey had moved on with his plan.
Bergevin has made alot of good deals in his 5 years here, also he has committed some blunders in those 5 years no different than any other GM has in their last 5 years. Stop pretending there is some mysterious super hero GM out there who never flubs it here and there and only makes home run deals because there isn't.