Maple Leafs @ Kraken | THU FEB 06 @ 10pm | TSN4

If Marner is out, I would have attempted to call up Steeves, and put him in a top six position, just to see if he can play with better guys at the NHL level. He deserves a shot, and if it's not going to be here, it's going to be elsewhere next year. 25 goals, 15 assists in 34 games at the AHL level... what more does a guy need to do?

Noting, he's at the AHL All Star game... so maybe not now.. but he deserves a legitimate shot.
 
Last edited:
Is Marner out again? Notice how good Matthews looked driving the play without Marner

Everytime I suggest to break them up people here argue for keeping them together
PP also looked sharper and faster without him hanging onto the puck. Unlike when he encounters traffic and treats the puck like a hand grenade.
 
This is good, I like this! A matchup nightmare for teams. Do they try to shutdown Matthews/Knies or JT/Marner/ Willy? I like this a lot. Let’s stick with this for a while.
True but you are playing with two 5th lines. Why not use 16 or 88 to drive the 3rd line? Good Luck with that strategy in the playoffs IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13
True but you are playing with two 5th lines. Why not use 16 or 88 to drive the 3rd line? Good Luck with that strategy in the playoffs IMO.

True, but that's an improvement on what we saw earlier. Maybe they will experiment some more in the next 29 games they have left?
 
If they pick up another center, I like this line up. Bobby McMann is good enough to drive his own line. If he’s got a clean shot on a goalie it’s probably going in.
I'm starting to think they will trade for Laughton. Domi needs to produce or they will move him back down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: francis246
Listening to Kyper talking about Willie playing for Sweden. Looking forward to seeing which Willie shows up and for which games.
 
Interesting lines. I like keeping Domi with Matthews. I think we could construct our lines with 3 combo: Matthews + Domi, Tavares + Marner, and Nylander + McMann. Get a center for 88 and McMann, and that's a great 3rd line.

I actually have zero issue with loading up line two like this IF the plan is to upgrade the third line behind them at the deadline. All for it actually.

We need three effective lines. I don’t really care how we get there
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad