GDT: Maple Leafs @ Devils - 7:00 PM - MSG

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drivingrain

Registered User
Jan 17, 2021
424
494
Found myself borderline angry that period. Took a breath. This team has won 13 in a row. No matter what happens, this has been f***ing awesome.

Better 2nd but need to get some higher quality chances in the 3rd. Leafs have done well keeping the Devils to the outside mostly.

I hope to progress beyond anger soon. Youre a better man than me, I'll get there i guess.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
29,429
52,754
NJ
Referee Justin Kea has 2 NHL games called



how are they gonna defer to him to waive off a goal? he doesn't know that rule
I don’t even understand the ruling for the second one. If no penalty is called, what’s the justification for calling it no goal? They didn’t call interference, he’s out of the crease, why no goal? Maybe it should’ve been called goalie interference, but they didn’t make that call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saugus

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
I missed the first two periods for pre-Thanksgiving dinner. How bad is it?
Really not bad. We're playing fine. Two rare turnovers lead to goals, two questionnable disallowed goals, 2 posts. But overall, we're dominating possession and wee had the 2nd. No puck luck whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Classic Devil

OmNomNom

Taco is Love, Taco is Life
Mar 3, 2011
23,214
16,230
In the Church of Salmela
I don’t even understand the ruling for the second one. If no penalty is called, what’s the justification for calling it no goal? They didn’t call interference, he’s out of the crease, why no goal? Maybe it should’ve been called goalie interference, but they didn’t make that call.
the one argument i heard was that Tatar should've made some kind of effort to avoid contact - didn't see that from him
 

Saugus

Ecrasez l'infame!
Sponsor
Jun 17, 2009
105,775
13,939
Connecticut
I don’t even understand the ruling for the second one. If no penalty is called, what’s the justification for calling it no goal? They didn’t call interference, he’s out of the crease, why no goal? Maybe it should’ve been called goalie interference, but they didn’t make that call.

There's no justification, and there will be none given. The league does not deign to explain itself to the peasants.

I still don't think this is malfeasance btw. Just incompetence. But that's just as bad, and it has the same result for us.
 

Nico13

Registered User
Nov 29, 2021
222
212
Switzerland
Well good third everybody. Too tired and pissed with this game. One of these games where nothing goes your way. Won't be surprised to see tomorrow that Murray kept the shutout. Probably a 0-3 game with the empty net.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,720
38,288
the one argument i heard was that Tatar should've made some kind of effort to avoid contact - didn't see that from him
No way the ref even saw that. Probably saw Murray with his arms up being down and waved it off.
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,523
46,252
Anthony Stewart making things up on Sportsnet: "The rules are the rules...you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you're not in the crease".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dialamo

Rhodes 81

grit those teeth
Nov 22, 2008
16,371
6,371
Atlanta
The first disallowed goal was bs. I'll die on this hill.
The first was a correct call but probably had no effect on the play, which sucks. The 2nd goal was BS because it can only be interference if it was intentional and then it should have been a penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad