Managerial Thread - 24/25 Season - Lmaonchester Lolnited

Chimaera

same ol' Caps
Feb 4, 2004
31,287
1,897
La Plata, Maryland
What actual track record does INEOS have. So far they bungled and publicly attempted to replace the past manager. Either pissing off or basically being rejected by most candidates. They then gutted the back room, forced some changes and Then they extended and had to fire him. They’ve cut costs to where it’s a running joke (and a bit of a disgrace to some). Sure, they’ve got some work moving on making that dump of a stadium less so, though that’s still down the road. They’ve come out and said they would pick players and hand to manager, only to pick a relatively rigid manager who needs particular players. They have failed to get rid of a lot of the junk that is there to significant returns. It’s still early days, but it looks closer to the former than latter

That’s without even considering they say their targets are 2028. What kind of a joke has it become where that’s acceptable
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spring in Fialta

maclean

Registered User
Jan 4, 2014
8,907
2,899
I will say this - yes, Amorim is a good hire. But bad environments can kill good coaches just as much as they can ruin good players, I'm sure I don't need to provide examples, so I'll pass no judgment one way or the other until we see how things pan out
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,227
11,381
What actual track record does INEOS have. So far they bungled and publicly attempted to replace the past manager. Either pissing off or basically being rejected by most candidates. They then gutted the back room, forced some changes and Then they extended and had to fire him. They’ve cut costs to where it’s a running joke (and a bit of a disgrace to some). Sure, they’ve got some work moving on making that dump of a stadium less so, though that’s still down the road. They’ve come out and said they would pick players and hand to manager, only to pick a relatively rigid manager who needs particular players. They have failed to get rid of a lot of the junk that is there to significant returns. It’s still early days, but it looks closer to the former than latter

That’s without even considering they say their targets are 2028. What kind of a joke has it become where that’s acceptable
If they were brilliant they wouldn't have given a lame duck manager an extension, let alone give them another nine figures in the transfer market. If they were brilliants they would have shut that down. That ETH payoff going to be on PSR now too
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad