Management Thread | Regular Season Edition

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,367
3,229
Canucks are running a 44% score adjusted CF% since the Miller benching game. Worst in the league over that stretch. xGF% is a bit worse at 42% and no appreciable difference pre- and post-Hronek injury.

Still think the team needs to maximize the current Hughes window but don’t blame management for wanting to wait and see a bit, because that’s probably not salvageable if it keeps up for another 10-12 games.

The problem is that management has set expectations at a certain level and if they fail to meet them there will likely be consequences. This owner is not known for his patience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector and pitseleh

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,979
1,954
vancouver
I think they got a little ahead of themselves. They looked at what would have helped the team in the playoffs and made additions without realizing they still need to get to the playoffs, and their subtractions will have a bigger impact on that.

Heinen will be a guy that when you lose a winger or two to injury he can fill in up and down the lineup. They brought in some trees on defense because of how much they were getting hammered. There's logic behind the moves but they put too much stock in ifs and maybes.
plus they adressed speed on the wings. which was their 2nd achilles heel in the edmonton series. boeser is and will always be slow. garland good north south guy. now they have sasson as well. the D was the biggest questionmark heading into this season.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,958
5,214
Listening to Drance on Canucks Talk, management was unsure about repeating the tall-dman roster strategy from last year. They did it as a trial this year. Meaning, it is not a template they believe in wholeheartedly. That is great news to me.

The focus has to be quality and not traits. Desharnais has a monstrous profile, but is on the outs because he can't play well enough. Soucy and Myers had strugged. Forbort wasn't a concern while Brannstrom was excelling etc...

Hopefully, that trial period is nearing its end and they work to increase the skill on defense, even at the expense of size.

I wouldn’t call it great news as you’d expect a competent management team to adapt their strategy to results.

Canucks are running a 44% score adjusted CF% since the Miller benching game. Worst in the league over that stretch. xGF% is a bit worse at 42% and no appreciable difference pre- and post-Hronek injury.

Still think the team needs to maximize the current Hughes window but don’t blame management for wanting to wait and see a bit, because that’s probably not salvageable if it keeps up for another 10-12 games.
I feel like the die has already been cast though. Management has already committed to a certain window with this core, and in some ways, the poor results almost necessitate bigger trades to stay on track.

I agree that pure rental trades make less sense but I also doubt they were planning on that given last years rentals.

They need to find another top four puck moving defensemen and then hope Tochett can adjust his system so that we are able to produce more offense but not at a significant cost to our offense.

Difficult task for management and there is a good chance the Canucks have peaked, but this retool was always going to difficult given the original pieces in place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerjoe

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
23,061
16,568
Don't see any GDT on the Sens game tonight......but so far, another bad first period on home ice.

Lose this one, and the Canucks are officially below the playoff bar in the West. Hardly where they expected to be, but where they belong, as least at the 30-game mark.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad