The post you are quoting is about a month old now and I've forgotten what already happened I've said but I will clarify regardless:
The reason for the timeline is that nobody, after the 23-24 season we had, was saying we need to trade Miller or Petey because the team was going to inevitably implode.
Perhaps some were saying so before last season, but not during or after it. Most assumed Petey's fall off a cliff was more a blip than a long-term concern, because his fall from top-10 player to ordinary depth player at a prime age is pretty much unprecedented across pro sports.
Just over a year ago it looked like we had two #1 centers, a #1 D-man and a #1 goalie. Nobody in their rightful mind at this point would have suggested blowing the team up or rebuilding or anything of the sort. To say you "saw this coming" after last season to me is completely disingenuous.
Pretty clearly we had different interpretations of punchmunkin's post about things being the responsibility of management.
There are a couple of things that I'd like to mention, although I'm not sure we're really disagreeing about them.
1. A set of gambles by management that didn't go their way is management responsibility whether they made those gambles in 2022 or 2024. (More on this later.)
2. I agree with you that virtually no management group would have wanted to break up the core of the gang last summer, but my reasoning is different.
Most of us on this board weren't in a position last summer to know there was an ongoing serious rift between Miller and Petey, but then we aren't privy to all that goes on with the team nor is it our job to know and make decisions for the team based on that knowledge.
There were a few posts suggesting last summer that EP40 be traded based on his disappearance the last half of the 2023-24 season, which wasn't the first time we'd seen his play drop off. Probably most of us will remember the resulting debates about whether or not and to what extent his poor play was because of physical injury (the tendonitis he reported at the 2024 post-season media availability).
Still, it seems to me that even if the possibility of things falling apart was foreseen by Allvin, standing pat at center might have seemed the far better gamble.
There are moves that this group has made that seem to me far more open to criticism than hanging on to their centers in 2024. Those include, just keeping to the center position:
-not extending Horvat in the summer of 2022, before his goal scoring spree in 22-23 raised his value
-extending Miller instead of trading him when the return would have been highest
-extending EP40 at 8 x 11.6
Any of those might be defensible. Some will think management was right about one of them, some two of them, maybe even some will agree with all of them or none of them, but with all of them being open to reasonable debate, pretty clearly the result, which includes the success of 2023-24, the failure of 2024-2025 and the outlook for the future, is the responsibility of the management that made those decisions.