haha, let's add some more vibes (all goalie stuff is vibes anyways) fwiw
Our goaltending hasn't even been that much worse than the teams we are "competing" for playoffs spots for either. The 4 worst team save percentages are in the Pacific and the average for the division is .890. 8 of the 20 (and 7 of the bottom 10) worst goals saved above expected are in the Pacific, and 14 of the 30 negative goalies in that stat ar in the Pacific.
I don’t think so.Well league wide sv% has dropped considerably. Pretty sure the average is almost down .015 Points. The top team other then the Bruins is at .916.
Also Vancouver is at .879 the Kings are .882
The Canucks stopped picks at .900 on the Canadian division season.
I think people probably overrated Demko.
Also the Canucks xGA this season would’ve been the worst (or bottom 2) last season.
Bad defence with a style that cheats for offence.
We have received really bad goaltending. We have also given up extremely dangerous chances that are going to be difficult for any goaltender to stop and that has caved our save %. It's not some weird coincidence that our two goalies who were very good to great last year have both been terrible. I think you are understating the impact of the defensive play.
The goaltending and defense have both been very bad. Nobody should be arguing otherwise. Unfortunately now we are just at a "confirmation bias" standstill because people are firmly planted that their pre-season prediction was correct and if it's incorrect it can be explained away.
I will say this: I don't think this team is good. The roster is flawed and I've said it since the off-season, as have many others. That being said, this team is better than they were last year on paper and are worse in the standings - and the goaltending is a big part of why they are where they are. But my honest opinion is this is the worst defense I've seen them play in many, many years. The quality of the chances given up just seems insane to me and maybe the analytics don't fully back that up.. but that's what I'm seeing.
Yes that one was a killer if they cant trade him. They obviously gambled he would rebound and got swayed by who he is a person vs hockey player and impactYou can justify the other deals pretty easily - Miller was 8th in NHL scoring last year, Mikheyev has been very solid value - and if they hadn't done the absolutely idiotic Boeser contract you could still tie everything together pretty easily.
And even if they just gave Boeser a one-year 'prove it' deal, it would still be fine and there would be financial flexibility when we said bye-bye to him this summer. But giving that deal for 3 years to a soft, slow complementary scorer was absolutely absurd.
Honestly, what is best case scenario for this team?
If:
1. Demko returns to play as a Top 5-10 goalie
2. The PP runs Top 5-10 in the league
3. The PK operates at even a slightly respectable level
Then what? Playoffs?
Possibly. Probably likely given the division.
But what is that? Maybe 2 or 3 in the division?
I’d bet money on any of Vegas, LA or Seattle (least right now) beating Van in a first round matchup.
Edm and Cal are going in circles.
SJ and Ana blow. Maybe Ana could turn things around but they have been all kinds of awful.
So to me, best case scenario, is making the playoffs to eventually lose in the 1st round.
That should not be the goal.
But unfortunately, deluded ownership and mgmt think otherwise.
well said and it also pisses me off that they are asking for money relating to and exceeding MillerI'll put this in the a management thread because it relates to contracts and who to trade...
Full disclosure, I am a big Horvat fan but have clearly stated in other threads that he needs to be traded, for the reasons others have stated repeatedly. That said, it kinda irks me that he picks this year to go on a heater. Some guys (I don't know why Alex Mogilny comes to mind) one expects to have a great offensive year in their contract year. For others, like Horvat, one expects (maybe hopes) that they will be in 100% try mode every year. While it's fun to watch Horvat score, part of me is disappointed that his level up year is a contract year. Is it simply a coincidence that it's a contract year. Maybe but highly unlikely.
Do I blame him if he's extra motivated to cash in? Reluctantly I say, not really. Ultimately it's just human nature (and prudent career management) to make as much for as long as possible. But it does send a message to other younger players that it's more about the individual than the team. And it takes a little bit of the shine off of Horvat's warrior image.
well said and it also pisses me off that they are asking for money relating to and exceeding Miller
Miller obviously is a hired gun he's American wasn't drafted or developed here it was most certainly gonna be about giving him a good for the player contract. He's produced at a 85 p/82 pace since arriving in Van and is making 8 million
Horvat meanwhile is our damn captain a career Canuck has been heavily criticized for not sticking up for his teammates or showing emotion in the past when it was needed and has even including his heater this year averaged 64 p/82
Basically extrapolating what Miller has been paid at a 94.117 per point basis Horvat should get 6.023 million yet here we are
8 million.....see ya
Honestly it feels like most of the forwards on this team are just playing to pad their stats, either that's somewhat true or they're just brutal defensively and lack hockey sense. EP is the one guy who constantly plays hard at both ends, the rest of the top 9 forwards all have disconnected controller and blowing the zone early moments. Even a guy like Mikheyev who was brought in as a defensive forwardIt honestly does make me question that players on the team do not have their priorities straight wrt playing on the team. The comedown for Miller especially. Makes me feel like we should just sign everyone to 1-year contracts if this is how they play when money is on the line and not glory.
It honestly does make me question that players on the team do not have their priorities straight wrt playing on the team. The comedown for Miller especially. Makes me feel like we should just sign everyone to 1-year contracts if this is how they play when money is on the line and not glory.
How often does giving the 30-year old the retirement contract off a peak season actually work out? The Canucks effectively paid over the probable UFA rate to convince Miller to stay.
Dumb decision making all around. They should have cut bait when he asked for ~$8MM on term. He’s the type of guy you try to retain on a contender by convincing him to take hometown discount.
yes its absurd and you got cheerleaders like fourtwenty who think because the cap is going up he's on a career season he's entitled to it. But he also cheered and supported Marners deal so who cares about team success and spreading it around just get your PP regular season pts and cash in baby.It honestly does make me question that players on the team do not have their priorities straight wrt playing on the team. The comedown for Miller especially. Makes me feel like we should just sign everyone to 1-year contracts if this is how they play when money is on the line and not glory.
Demko coming back to form is imperative to taking advantage of any sort of window that exists. Otherwise we're stuck in mediocrity (and without serious changes to our defense we probably are anyways)Honestly, what is best case scenario for this team?
If:
1. Demko returns to play as a Top 5-10 goalie
2. The PP runs Top 5-10 in the league
3. The PK operates at even a slightly respectable level
Then what? Playoffs?
Possibly. Probably likely given the division.
But what is that? Maybe 2 or 3 in the division?
I’d bet money on any of Vegas, LA or Seattle (least right now) beating Van in a first round matchup.
Edm and Cal are going in circles.
SJ and Ana blow. Maybe Ana could turn things around but they have been all kinds of awful.
So to me, best case scenario, is making the playoffs to eventually lose in the 1st round.
That should not be the goal.
But unfortunately, deluded ownership and mgmt think otherwise.
What do you think they should do to improve the situation, @VanJack? If you were GM, what would you propose?Is see Craig Button has unloaded on Rutherford and the Canucks for job they've done on roster assembly. He regards the forced trade of Horvat as an epic 'fail' by the organization.
One thing is for certain.....the dysfunction at the junction in Vancouver is the talk of the NHL. It just seems that with COVID fiasco two years ago; followed by the mass firing early last season; and graduating to this year's mess in the coaching department and in the front office, this franchise is becoming the butt of jokes and black humor.
But it starts at the top--with vain, vacuous and venal ownership.
Well when things aren’t going well everything looks like a mess. You start winning then you become a model franchise. Just look at Sakic and the Avs.Is see Craig Button has unloaded on Rutherford and the Canucks for job they've done on roster assembly. He regards the forced trade of Horvat as an epic 'fail' by the organization.
One thing is for certain.....the dysfunction at the junction in Vancouver is the talk of the NHL. It just seems that with COVID fiasco two years ago; followed by the mass firing early last season; and graduating to this year's mess in the coaching department and in the front office, this franchise is becoming the butt of jokes and black humor.
But it starts at the top--with vain, vacuous and venal ownership.
Well when things aren’t going well everything looks like a mess. You start winning then you become a model franchise. Just look at Sakic and the Avs.
Water isn’t wet. It makes other things wet. Water is probably my closest biological comparison in that regard.It's a results-driven business so...yeah? I mean that's kinda like saying water is wet lol.
What's more interesting is Button gave Benning so many passes year after year when it wasn't working.
Water isn’t wet. It makes other things wet. Water is probably my closest biological comparison in that regard.
Now now, Brock has had a hard year every year since years became official.Boeser should ask himself just how bad you have to look for your to have effectively negative value despite putting up 26 points in 39 games.
That is because xGA does not account for preshot movement in any meaningful way.I'm with MS here. Guys, take a look at some goalie analytics. The Canucks probably have the worst goaltending in the league this season. It's really bad. Martin and Demko have a combined -25 goals saved above expected (or in other words 25 goals saved under expected I guess). Only the Sharks goaltending is worse (Reimer and Kahkonen with a combined -28.3).
Brock is doubling his career average 2nd assist per 60 rate this year.Boeser should ask himself just how bad you have to look for your to have effectively negative value despite putting up 26 points in 39 games.
Isn't it weird how all those goalies play on teams that are garbage defensively?I literally gave us +10 GSAA which would be top ten but that wasn’t good enough for MS.