We currently have $14.5 million in cap space against an $83.5 million cap, but really that's probably $17 million because it's hugely likely Poolman will be Ferlanded as a LTIR case.
I've said I'd do 3 things :
1) Buy out OEL.
2) Trade Myers once his bonus is paid and he only has $1 million in salary owing for next year. He should be very tradeable at that stage. If you need to add a pick, do it.
3) Retain down to $5 million on Boeser and hopefully get a pick or something back.
Do those 3 things and we clear $18 million in cap space.
That leaves $32.5 million (or really $35 million) of cap space for 23-24, of which Kuzmenko and Horvat will only take ~$14.5 million. Bear will probably take another $2 million.
Once you fill in a couple depth signings that should still leave a reasonable amount to try and make a couple smart mid-level UFA signings to replace Myers and OEL. Or what I'd really like is some sort of Boeser-Provorov trade.
I'm also not even touching a Garland trade or a Pearson buyout (or dump with a pick) here, which are also possibilities.
It is sort of uncertain as to whether either of 2 or 3 above are actually doable. I know lots of us have discussed these type of trades, and hope for them, but the number under performing contracts with term or high cap hits, or both, that are traded every off season is exceedingly small and it wouldn't surprise me that there are no takers and that we would need to attached significant picks to move them.
I am also not a fan of paying Horvat long term based on him being a 50 goal scorer. It seems like a bad bet, and frankly, even ignoring all of the other relevant facts, I don't think I would sign Horvat at this point. And this isn't to say I am necessarily against signing a 28 year old to a long term deal, I would just want that player to have had a sustained period of success before doing so. In fact, I'd be fine paying a bit more.
And sure, you can use a combination of dumping players for picks and buyouts to free up cap space, but at the end of the day, you are then going to need to fill that cap space with very good players, and you won't have much draft capital given the picks traded so you are going to largely need to look at the UFA market (which in the case of defense, is actually pretty poor this summer) and in that case you likely won't be getting any value of those players. So while I get that cap space could be freed up, in practice, I struggle to see how this will work.
I think MS covered all this a few pages back. Opening up capspace really shouldn't be a huge issue assuming they're open to buyouts, retention and moving some picks here and there. The issue will be a lack of assets(those picks needed to move contracts also come in handy acquiring players) to actually constructively build the team.
Yes, exactly.
What a f***ing moron.
'My performance got critical acclaim' says the guy who signed almost all of the bad contracts that f***ed over this organization, including the current too-short Pettersson deal.
Yes, he does come off like an idiot. But keep in mind he was the assistant GM and general counsel, and it likely wasn't up to him what kind of general terms he could offer.
I did miss Moser.
Peterka is a 13-minute, 30 point player. He isn’t doing anything over and above a Jimmy Vesey or Sam Gagner.
I think the team should be doing everything possible to sign Horvat. If the trade him, yes, they should be going after one prime asset with a large chance of hitting.
If they take a Lapierre/1st package or that sort of thing - which is what most people seem to want - that is absolute dog shit. It’s an idiotic trade.
Are you willing to pay Horvat as a 50 goal scorer? I am surprised you are so insistent on "doing everything possible to sign Horvat" as this would mean signing him to a huge contract the value of which would be based on a very small sample size which frankly, in my view, is not sustainable. Seems like a terrible idea to me.