Johnny Hoxville
The Return of a Legend
Honestly this is one of the worst proposals I’ve ever seen. You can’t be serious.
Value of: Make Your Proposal for Sean Monahan
- Thread starter Bjornar Moxnes
- Start date
Holy shit, that's what a 30-30 1st Line C is worth? The most important position in the league, i wouldn't touch this with a 50 FOOT POLE
B. Tkachuk
For
Ruzicka
Kylington
2nd RP 2022
For
Ruzicka
Kylington
2nd RP 2022
treple13
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 2,849
- 1,528
As someone who’s a fan of a team that had issues down the middle for years I’m perplexed by Flames’ fans perspective that moving “Lindy” to center means that Monahan is on the move when they constantly rate him a 1b or high end second line center. In this scenario wouldn’t it make more sense to have both of them at center and love Backland given their respective ages and upside? I thought the Flames were rebuilding... or is that perspective incorrect?
Brown is a project were we don't know if he will succeed. He would be a great addition to a team with 2 proven C's (longterm) already who can take the chance on him busting. I don't see the flames interested in him. Plus he probably doesn't have much value currently.
Thompson is looking petty meh rn... So yeah I don't see this package touching his value.
Im interested in him though... Not sure what his value is so won't make a proposal but id probably have Brann or Norris as the main piece and id assume it would be a ++ to make them move him
Thompson is looking petty meh rn... So yeah I don't see this package touching his value.
Im interested in him though... Not sure what his value is so won't make a proposal but id probably have Brann or Norris as the main piece and id assume it would be a ++ to make them move him
InfinityIggy
Zagidulin's Dad
InfinityIggy
Zagidulin's Dad
Im not sure I agree regarding minutes. If you have Monahan and Lindholm both center their own lines, you have two proto-first lines. Which you probably deploy about equally.
This allows you to use Backlund where he is actually most talented: as a pure shutdown C on the 3rd line. He has enough skill to make use of his wingers, even in that scenario.
Which leaves you with Ryan to run the 4th line, which he is great at.
Yikes man. I know Monahan has some debate to if he’s a 1C or not, but you don’t get a 1A/1B Centre for that package.
Sparksrus3
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2012
- 10,103
- 4,996
and stop calling me Shirley
Pirate King Luffy
Ferkland
Tkachuk Norris
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2012
- 16,017
- 7,416
At this time you are right, Monahan is the best of the two. But, hopefuly, he might get equal or if the Habs finally get a break of non PPG players, be even better in a near future. Suzuki is a very interesting player. If there ever is hockey next season keep an eye on him!
Last edited:
Maurice of Orange
13:21 🏒🏒
- Feb 5, 2016
- 10,758
- 7,309
Calgary would easily decline.
Logan Brown might not even crack Ottawa’s lineup as a 4C, Lassi Thomson is most likely still atleast 2 seasons away from trying to crack an NHL roster, it’s also not clear what Thomson may even be and a 2nd with the aforementioned players is not enough for a proven #1 center in Monahan.
Brown is a scoring line centre. If he wasn't injury prone this would be a reasonable offer. Batherson, Thomson and a 2nd is a fair offer.
Maurice of Orange
13:21 🏒🏒
- Feb 5, 2016
- 10,758
- 7,309
Ok but why would Calgary except this offer. The Flames are a team that is still trying to compete so why would they be willing to trade their #1C with a lesser replacement for Logan Brown or Drake Batherson who are no where near being a 1C and probably wouldn’t even make Calgary’s 2nd line in 20-21.
I could see this deal making more sense if Calgary was rebuilding but Calgary is not a rebuilding team so I would decline this trade from a Calgary POV.
GIN ANTONIC
Registered User
This won’t be the best offer in the thread and would only make sense if the Flames thou Lindholm could slide over as 1C but this is what Carolina could offer.
- Trochek (2 x 4.75)
- Fleury or Bean
- B level prospect
I’d say depending on if Calgary wants Fleury or Bean it would affect the level of prospect included. For Fleury the prospect would be lower, Bean it would be higher.
Trochek would be the 2C for Calgary. He won’t produce as much as Monahan but there’s also over $1.5 mil in cap savings.
Bean is ready for the NHL and would slot in after Hanifin on the left side. He would need a defensively responsible vet D man to bring him along though.
If he continues his play from last year, Fleury is ready for consistent top 4 play. He can play in all situations and brings size and some physicality. Can also play both sides.
For the prospect Canes have a lot in the forward pipeline so there’d be something good to pick from in there depending on what Calgary wants to key in on.
- Trochek (2 x 4.75)
- Fleury or Bean
- B level prospect
I’d say depending on if Calgary wants Fleury or Bean it would affect the level of prospect included. For Fleury the prospect would be lower, Bean it would be higher.
Trochek would be the 2C for Calgary. He won’t produce as much as Monahan but there’s also over $1.5 mil in cap savings.
Bean is ready for the NHL and would slot in after Hanifin on the left side. He would need a defensively responsible vet D man to bring him along though.
If he continues his play from last year, Fleury is ready for consistent top 4 play. He can play in all situations and brings size and some physicality. Can also play both sides.
For the prospect Canes have a lot in the forward pipeline so there’d be something good to pick from in there depending on what Calgary wants to key in on.
Sensfourlife
Registered User
- Aug 22, 2020
- 194
- 104
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Monahan lead the team in points these playoffs. Kadri made a habit in Toronto of making his entire team disappear in the playoffs.
CraigsList
RIP #13
I didn't know 8 points in 10 games was disappearing but okay.
He wasn't his best when we needed him in a clutch game, but he wasn't a disappearing act like most are saying. Come on.
Honestly thats a "solid" offer, but both Bean and Fluery are Left Dmen, Calgary would want a right hander if any dman was coming back, so in this deal instead of the "B level ish prospect" I'd want a 1st ... if not then we just have to swap the 2nd piece of the deal(Bean/Fluery) and get a right dman with possibly no 3rd piece needed?
zizbuka
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2017
- 1,196
- 1,227
CraigsList
RIP #13
Nah I'd do it. Bean could very well make Hanifin expendable. I'd rather we get a 1st rounder as the last main piece in the trade and Calgary gives back a mid pick.
Backlund
Registered User
I've criticized Monahan plenty for the things he needs to improve on but this thread is full of people offering spare parts for a 26 year old career 60 point center like they grow on trees. One bad year does not mean he will get dealt for these garbage packages. None of these offers will get you Monahan. Some of them wouldn't even get you Bennett.
