*OvechKiN*
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2005
- 601
- 91
Jost for Monahan
Has Monahan's value declined a lot? Some of these offers are horrendous.
If this two trades happened, gotta give the W to Sakic.Bennett for Landeskog
If this two trades happened, gotta give the W to Sakic.
Jost for Monahan=massive win for Avs
Bennett for Landeskog=big win for Flames
YesBennett and Monahan for Landeskog and Jost?
I would not.You're such a fan boy that you'd probably say you wouldn't trade Suzuki straight up for Monahan.
Krejci + Debrusk for Monahan + Bennett
JVR and Ghost for Monahan and Bennett.
JVR and Ghost for Monahan and Bennett.
LMAO what? Kadri is a time bomb. Monahan is a much better player and isn't going to throw an entire game (hell even series) for you just because he can't control his mental. He's like Zach Kassian but actually decent at hockey. I would have happily taken him as a 2C last year in the nixed Brodie trade but no way in hell would I ever consider moving Monahan for him.Flames don't really need Landeskog. They already have a much better version in Chuckie.
I would trade Moahanan straight up for Kadri though. Kadri is a gamer. Imagine Kadri and Chuckie on the same line.
Which screams out. Don’t trade him.No, it's just posters who don't have a clue on a player who is playing just fine as a 1C. Is he a top 15C in the NHL? No, but he gets the job done while the Flames don't have a 1C replacement.
For a much better player, Monahan sure has an odd tendency to disappear in playoff games. Those games and moments matter to some fans and GMs.LMAO what? Kadri is a time bomb. Monahan is a much better player and isn't going to throw an entire game (hell even series) for you just because he can't control his mental. He's like Zach Kassian but actually decent at hockey. I would have happily taken him as a 2C last year in the nixed Brodie trade but no way in hell would I ever consider moving Monahan for him.
I think Danault is a very underrated player but this is going too far. Monahan is one season removed from PPG and is a steady 70 point C imo.That’s not a bad offer. I’m probably in the minority but I’d do that in a heartbeat. Danault is about equal to Monahan at this point, Byron would be amazing in our bottom 6 and flip Tatar to the highest bidder. I’m all for it.
Wow, i hope this is general consensus and Philly makes a move to steal him.Montreal gets fleeced in a deal like that. Danault on his own is better than Monahan.
Well.... You're doing it based off cap so I can respect that. My gripe would be with claiming Suzuki is a better player. Monahan is becoming one of the most underrated players in the league.I would not.
Rather take the gamble of a controlled AAV younger player during the cap crunch. Also I am pretty confident Suzuki can be a 60 point centre and if lucky better.
So...
Nope.
Vegas traded theirs last month for a 3rd and a guy Winnipeg got off the waiver wire.Last time this happened was in 2005(?) when the Sharks got Joe Thornton for Brad Stuart, Wayne Primeau and Marco Strum. Before that, was it the Gretzky to L.A. trade? Trading for a 1c is incredibly rare.