KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,543
- 13,365
Just because you said this LA is now offering Clarke, Byfield, and this years 1st for Blackwood.No PLEASE NO. As a Kings fan, I veto this inquiry by KingsHockey24.
Throw petersen and quick into that deal and I’ll think about itJust because you said this LA is now offering Clarke, Byfield, and this years 1st for Blackwood.
What's the price of Blackwood? We have an abundance of RHD, and centers.
LA does make sense if the Devils can trade another goalie before this trade. It doesn't have to be a 3 way deal, those can be a separate deals.Devils aren't trading Blackwood without getting a goalie back I reckon. LA doesn't make sense unless it's a 3 way deal.
Because Quick and Petersen. That's why. Why trade for Blackwood to be a 3rd string goalie?Why not
I doubt it. Peterson hasn't been as good as last year, but has still been far better than Blackwood was this year. I suppose the Kings might do it if they are regretting the Peterson contract extension and desperately want out of it.Is Blackwood that much of an upgrade on Peterson?
if you make faber available, you have a deal with me.What's the price of Blackwood? We have an abundance of RHD, and centers.
goalie for goalie most likely won't work, if you don't want to settle for a worse one.Devils aren't trading Blackwood without getting a goalie back I reckon. LA doesn't make sense unless it's a 3 way deal.
I mean I agree, which is why I think Blackwood is very likely not going anywhere and all ill feelings get smoothed over for another year.goalie for goalie most likely won't work, if you don't want to settle for a worse one.
a team trading for blackwood wants him to upgrade the position. if you are not married to blackwood, you trade him for the best possible return and try to find another goaltender via trade or the fa market.
I doubt it. Peterson hasn't been as good as last year, but has still been far better than Blackwood was this year. I suppose the Kings might do it if they are regretting the Peterson contract extension and desperately want out of it.
NoIs Blackwood that much of an upgrade on Peterson?
Not a chance Farber would be available.if you make faber available, you have a deal with me.
I reckon MacKenzie Blackwood barely has the value of the draft pick he was chosen at. The goalie New Jersey 'gets back' is better off being the one they get in free agency.Devils aren't trading Blackwood without getting a goalie back I reckon. LA doesn't make sense unless it's a 3 way deal.
There's only 3 guys in FA you can say that about IRC: Kuemper, Campbell, and Husso. it's very risky to trade Blackwood at the draft betting on one of those three being available and willing to sign in NJ. Devils also need two NHL goalies then if they send away Blackwood, can they get two of those? no chance.I reckon MacKenzie Blackwood barely has the value of the draft pick he was chosen at. The goalie New Jersey 'gets back' is better off being the one they get in free agency.