DingDongCharlie
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2010
- 11,682
- 9,789
Bad giveaway by Foegele
Does that mins after I walk back my Holland should have traded him comments
Bad giveaway by Foegele
He needs to stop being in such a good position to score!It doesn't go in if it doesn't bounce off him where he was standing so I don't see the point of getting too upset about it.
The puck f***ing hit Zach Hyman. Reimer made the save then the rebound hit Hyman, goes up in the air and in.That doesn't matter. Hyman made contact with the goalie in the crease. That is an automatic no goal regardless of if the goalie could or couldn't have made the save.
lmao jeez eh little rattled are we. Sorry you feel that way, but again these types of plays have been called off almost every time this year. Its hilarious how mad you are about this.Except that Hyman and Reimer never made contact.
You’re right he made the save.c the rebound bounced off Hyman. Hyman in no way impeded him from making any save.
Get lost.
HFOil not know the goalie interference rules?
That was a clear call no goal.
Reimer wasn’t able to get to the rebound because Hyman was the creaseHe did not interfere with him. The goalie made the save and the rebound bounced in off Hyman.
There’s nothing in the rule book that says a player must be out of the crease when a goal is scored. They scrapped that a long time ago.
He did not interfere with him. The goalie made the save and the rebound bounced in off Hyman.
There’s nothing in the rule book that says a player must be out of the crease when a goal is scored. They scrapped that a long time ago.
It’s almost like they had made up their mind before the review. Not like NHL refs don’t have a proven history of deciding calls ahead of time…The puck f***ing hit Zach Hyman. Reimer made the save then the rebound hit Hyman, goes up in the air and in.
It's atrocious, because they only look at where Hyman is not what happened.
In Bakersfield would be better imo.Gaining confidence, save after save. That's atleast how I imagine Soup is able to get back on track..
the issue is that it was nearly impossible for Reimer to save the shot that went off of Hyman, because Hyman was physically in the way. Even if Reimer would not have saved it either way, I can see the logic of the intereference callThe puck f***ing hit Zach Hyman. Reimer made the save then the rebound hit Hyman, goes up in the air and in.
It's atrocious, because they only look at where Hyman is not what happened.
We know they definitely dont.You think the NHL does?
Hyman had nothing to do with him losing sight of the puck.Yeah, idk, Reimer was able to make the same and could have made the next one of he didn't lose sight of it.
I get it though, he clearly impeded his movement. Just don't like the ambiguity.
You think the NHL does?
Gaining confidence, save after save. That's atleast how I imagine Soup is able to get back on track..
Reimer wasn’t able to get the rebound because he didn’t know where the puck was. There’s no rule saying a player has to be out of the crease. You keep trying to go back to that being the rule…but that’s not the rule. He’s allowed to be in the crease. He didn’t impede the goalie from making the save. They never made contact.Reimer wasn’t able to get to the rebound because Hyman was the crease
Pretty clear call there