I hope this doesn't sound too harsh...that's a loser's mentality.
Lander is a center. Take the BPA. Position should have nothing to do with it. Eberle is RW btw. He can't play center. I'm also pretty sure that guys like Omark and MPS can play RW but I'm not sure. I'm pretty sure I've seen MPS play the right side on the pp before.Well, do we? For one thing, the ISS dropped him from 1st overall to 2nd overall on the March Top 30. Seguin took his place and I'm really starting to wonder if he might be the better fit on the Oilers.
Hall is a left-winger; and we have more than enough LWs on our prospect roster: Pääjãrvi-Svensson, Ömark, and Lander, just to name a few, and it's pretty safe to expect them to be in the NHL at some point in the next three years.
Seguin, however, is a centre. While we do have prospect depth at centre (Eberle, Nash) we could use a little bit more depth there. Nash doesn't look quite as NHL-ready as Eberle (or even Lander) and could be a bargaining chip. In my opinion, we'd be better off with Seguin than Hall. We have no depth at all on the right wing (particularly in terms of prospects, where Toni Rajala leads that pack for us) and it'd be nice to have a versatile winger.
Thoughts?
Posted via Mobile Device
MPS is a LW and I think Omark is as well. I could be wrong though.Lander is a center. Take the BPA. Position should have nothing to do with it. Eberle is RW btw. He can't play center. I'm also pretty sure that guys like Omark and MPS can play RW but I'm not sure. I'm pretty sure I've seen MPS play the right side on the pp before.
I just don't see Boston giving that pick up... 2nd overall, Ryder and Wideman for Hemsky and Gagner?.
MPS is a LW and I think Omark is as well. I could be wrong though.
I hope this doesn't sound too harsh...that's a loser's mentality.
BTW I was going to say. Somebody tell me if this comparison fits or not. Henrik Zetterberg and Taylor Hall.
I don't really see it. Zetts is a solid two way player that most often plays centre. I don't see Hall as a centreman in the NHL but more of a winger like Rick Nash (but not as physical)...
To me if I'm the Oilers, you take the BPA period. Although the thought of potentially drafting a franchise centreman in Seguin would be intruiging as they are pretty much needed to have any chance at a Stanley Cup. Most Cup winners have solid #1, and #2 centres...
Don't be surprised to see Torontos pick end up 3rd or 4th. Tampa and the Islanders are tanking big time.You guys need a center, we need a wing.
You take Seguin, we take Hall...everyone wins.
Get the guitars and practice up on your kumbaya
Well, do we? For one thing, the ISS dropped him from 1st overall to 2nd overall on the March Top 30. Seguin took his place and I'm really starting to wonder if he might be the better fit on the Oilers.
Hall is a left-winger; and we have more than enough LWs on our prospect roster: Pääjãrvi-Svensson, Ömark, and Lander, just to name a few, and it's pretty safe to expect them to be in the NHL at some point in the next three years.
Seguin, however, is a centre. While we do have prospect depth at centre (Eberle, Nash) we could use a little bit more depth there. Nash doesn't look quite as NHL-ready as Eberle (or even Lander) and could be a bargaining chip. In my opinion, we'd be better off with Seguin than Hall. We have no depth at all on the right wing (particularly in terms of prospects, where Toni Rajala leads that pack for us) and it'd be nice to have a versatile winger.
Thoughts?
Posted via Mobile Device
I think usually people that use the "stacked team" argument haven't watched many Windsor games. A lot of players stats are inflated because they're playing with Hall....and that even includes Fowler to come extent from what I've seen. I don't think he's a franchise Dman.
Hall is overrated so much. He's on a stacked Windsor Spitfires team. He really wasn't anything special in the WJC, and I don't see Elite/Superstar potential in Hall.