Petterssonic
Registered User
Thought he had a pretty decent tourney. Sweden will need him to be a driver on offense at the WJC.
Point's don't matter much IMO in this meaningless tourney.
Creating opportunists is much more important, and he had multiple.
Great for him.
Höglander with a lacrosse-style goal
Höglander with a lacrosse-style goal
Höglander with a lacrosse-style goal
Hoglander scores a Michigan and you’re already pencilling him into our future top 6? IMO Lind or Madden have a much higher chance of becoming a top 6 player. Hoglander has loads of skill and abilities but after watching him this year he leaves a lot to be desired. Really needs to simplify his game and start making better decisions with and without the puck, because right now I don’t see high end hockey IQ. I think he’d be a perfect 3rd liner on a contender if he reaches his potential.Unlikely, but if the Canucks can have a regular top 6 of
Miller - Pettersson - Boeser
Hoglander - Horvat - Podkolzin
going forward, i like the style of the players on the 2nd line vs the 1st line. Lots of grit and skill combination.
Please reread what I said.Hoglander scores a Michigan and you’re already pencilling him into our future top 6? IMO Lind or Madden have a much higher chance of becoming a top 6 player. Hoglander has loads of skill and abilities but after watching him this year he leaves a lot to be desired. Really needs to simplify his game and start making better decisions with and without the puck, because right now I don’t see high end hockey IQ. I think he’d be a perfect 3rd liner on a contender if he reaches his potential.
Redundant? From what I'm seeing on here (not just you, your comment was just the one I responded to) all of a sudden Hoglander is a steal and a surefire top 6 forward. Here is one right here:Please reread what I said.
"Unlikely".
I put that for a reason so I wouldn't get a redundant comment like this, but I guess people don't read.
Why is it redundant? He hasn't looked like a first-round-caliber prospect this season yet this goal changes things? I don't get it.STEAL for the second round.
Two years from now, people are going to have him 15th - 20th when they do a redraft for his draft year.
Guy is going to be a legit 50 pt, second line winger with character and two-way play
It was a stylistical potential top 6. I like the styles of Hoglander and Podkolzin if they were to reach their ceilings, or even become 2nd line guys in alongside Horvat. That's all it was.Redundant? From what I'm seeing on here (not just you, your comment was just the one I responded to) all of a sudden Hoglander is a steal and a surefire top 6 forward. Here is one right here:
Why is it redundant? He hasn't looked like a first-round-caliber prospect this season yet this goal changes things? I don't get it.
To do that move with a defender near him is ballsy. Usually that move is done when the player is alone behind the net