Phion Keneuf
Bang Bang
- Jul 4, 2010
- 35,862
- 7,269
I definitely see the Justin Abdelkader comparison
He's a lot more talented than Abdelkader. Way better hands and shot.I definitely see the Justin Abdelkader comparison
Reminds me of Hudson Fasching at the same age.
and Snuggerrud. Quite the team.Well deserved. Shame he's on a team with Cooley, Faber, and Lacombe all taking some of the shine.
lol if you think Knies is more deserving the Snuggerud or Cooley I don't know what to tell you.So many pathetic Montreal fans that don’t even watch college hockey are crying in the replies. Have some class and recognize that you might not know more about these players from reading a stat sheet than the coaches in the NCAA. Just not a good look for that fanbase.
Those 3 finalists are well deserving, but my vote would be for Fantilli.
Perhaps take it up with the people that selected him, or the people that named him Big10 player of the year. I don't know what to tell you.lol if you think Knies is more deserving the Snuggerud or Cooley I don't know what to tell you.
LOL. I watch every single Gopher game. You watch the stats. Knies is way more deserving than Snuggerud.lol if you think Knies is more deserving the Snuggerud or Cooley I don't know what to tell you.
Hmm, nice profile pic lol. And ya, from an objective standpoint I think Hutson was probably more deserving but since it's votes it makes sense. Knies had a good season for sure but him being top 3 ahead of Hutson is definitely debatable.So many pathetic Montreal fans that don’t even watch college hockey are crying in the replies. Have some class and recognize that you might not know more about these players from reading a stat sheet than the coaches in the NCAA. Just not a good look for that fanbase.
Those 3 finalists are well deserving, but my vote would be for Fantilli.
Knies is boosted by coming back when he could have gone pro. I.e. loyalty to college hockey. But people on here think this award is just about points and being the best hockey player.Hmm, nice profile pic lol. And ya, from an objective standpoint I think Hutson was probably more deserving but since it's votes it makes sense. Knies had a good season for sure but him being top 3 ahead of Hutson is definitely debatable.
Should be who it goes too. Getting the award because you are "loyal to college hockey" is pretty lame IMOKnies is boosted by coming back when he could have gone pro. I.e. loyalty to college hockey. But people on here think this award is just about points and being the best hockey player.
Good thing the award goes to the best college hockey player and not based on loyalty then.Getting the award because you are "loyal to college hockey" is pretty lame IMO
What you're looking for is this:Should be who it goes too. Getting the award because you are "loyal to college hockey" is pretty lame IMO
The most coveted award in collegiate hockey, the Hobey Baker Award is given to the top NCAA men’s ice hockey player in the nation. Winners are chosen not for raw skill or stats or character alone, though those are important. They are selected for everything they do.Good thing the award goes to the best college hockey player and not based on loyalty then.