I don’t know that the big picture has changed that much with Eiserman. He still looks like the same player. I think there’s less spotlight on him because now he was drafted.
He can work on being more engaged and more tactical on the defensive end, but I see the biggest problem still as he might not be enough of a positive player when he’s not scoring goals to generate the type of ice time that’ll get him all the goals that he can score.
He’s a weird hockey player. To me there are fundamental problems with his hockey sense with the puck on his stick, his passing, his puck handling, his board battles, and then obviously his defense and general engagement in his game. How much of that is fixable? I genuinely don’t know. I think some is, but is enough fixable to want to play him top line NHL minutes? Top 6? Middle six? 3rd line? Sheltered PP specialist? You rarely see a player where you’re convinced he will be able to do the hard part in the NHL, but questioning if he can do the easy part.