Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,208
- 12,692
Only four players I would take before him.
He has been a scoring machine his whole career so far.
He's a mål machine
Only four players I would take before him.
He has been a scoring machine his whole career so far.
Best shooter in the draft love his release. Should be a consistent 30 goal scorer, top 10 pick
Until one looks at the top of this draft and realizes the top 8-10 is insane.As consistent 30 goalscorer, he should be top 5.
Sup everyone. Here is the latest scouting report I made on Alexander Holtz
Thanks, another great video from you. Jack Quinn scouting report coming soon?
Looking forward to it.Yup I should have one on Quinn in the next week
Not really no, guy can flat out score, and by the end of the SHL season he was great at attacking the blue line, and wasn't caught cheating in the d-zone as much as he had been doing. But here's a fresh, bold, prediction: Detroit takes him. Lets call it a gut feeling.Is there any reason I shouldn't want Anaheim to take this guy at 6? (assuming Laf, Byfield, Stutzle, Rossi, and Drysdale are off the board) I seem to be alone in wanting him at 6, but I personally think he's the best available and better than Raymond and Perfetti
Is there any reason I shouldn't want Anaheim to take this guy at 6? (assuming Laf, Byfield, Stutzle, Rossi, and Drysdale are off the board) I seem to be alone in wanting him at 6, but I personally think he's the best available and better than Raymond and Perfetti
Is there any reason I shouldn't want Anaheim to take this guy at 6? (assuming Laf, Byfield, Stutzle, Rossi, and Drysdale are off the board) I seem to be alone in wanting him at 6, but I personally think he's the best available and better than Raymond and Perfetti
Is there any reason I shouldn't want Anaheim to take this guy at 6? (assuming Laf, Byfield, Stutzle, Rossi, and Drysdale are off the board) I seem to be alone in wanting him at 6, but I personally think he's the best available and better than Raymond and Perfetti
How did a 18 yo get ice time in such a conservative environment as SHL if he is a one dimensional sniper?I think so.
Great at putting the puck in the net. Probably won't have much value elsewhere. I'm not saying he's the exact same player because there are differences, but I see his game a lot like if Caufield was 6'0. I doubt most of his other parts of his game will be much better or worse than league average. He'll score some goals, but I think at 6 you are looking for a player who has more of an impact in some other parts of the game. Like others have said, I don't think he'll bust, but I personally don't see him ever being a superstar 45-50 goal scorer. His ceiling is probably something around Brock Boeser. He wouldn't be the worst pick at 6, but I think there will be better players available.
How did a 18 yo get ice time in such a conservative environment as SHL if he is a one dimensional sniper?
Well, he's not. I have watched Holtz in person about 10 times this season, and a bunch more on TV. I think he's a better prospect than Raymond (by a hair) because I feel he does the little things well. His willingness to battle for the puck, combined with his very open communication with his teammates makes him a better target for me if I have a high pick. Raymond is a great prospect as well, and offensively probably more fun to watch, but I have my reservations about him especially without the puck
I don't think Holtz is as one dimensional as people are making him out to be. His playmaking is just fine, he has decent top speed, his pace and compete are great. If scouts really believed he was just a shooter he would go 20th pick or below. The book has been out on his shot for a long time, and teams/goalies still can't stop it. I bet he would have scored 70 in the CHL and there would be less discussion on whether he was top 10 worthy.